problematic and puzzling. this is a facially incomplete and inadequate record in order to impeach a president. allow me to be candid in my closing remarks, because we have limited time, we are living in the very period described by alexander hamilton, a period of agitated passions. i get it. you re mad. the president s mad. my republican friends are mad. my democratic friends are mad. my wife is mad. my kids are mad. even my dog seems mad. and luke is a golden doodle and they gone get mad. so we re all mad. where has that taken us? well, in the slip shot of impeachment make us less mad? will it only invite and invitation for the madness to
of this investigation which is problematic and puzzling. this is a facially incomplete and inadequate record in order to impeach a president. allow me to be candid in my closing remarks because we have limited time. we are living in the very period described by alexander hamilton, a period of agitated passions. i get it. you re mad. the president s mad. my republican friends are mad. my democratic friends are mad. my wife is mad. my kids are mad. even my dog seems mad. and luna is a golden doodle and they don t get mad. so we re all mad. where has that taken us? well, in a slipshod impeachment, will it make us less mad? will it only invite an
forward, those facts indicate that an impeachment inquiry is definitely appropriate under these cigars. gillian: well, sir, being an evidence-based guy, do you think it was a mistake for speaker pelosi to launch an informal impeachment inquiry before the american people had a chance to see the underlying evidence, the transcript and the whistleblower complaint? oh, not at all. remember, the inquiry is to bring out evidence, right? the inquiry is to get evidence to demonstrate to the american people what s going on. but facially, this president s own statements are enough to give rise to a formal impeachment inquiry. gillian: but, sir, don t you think that it maybe made her case less palatable for a whole lot of folks that she s going to need to back her in these proceedings? meaning, if she had kuwaited a little waited a little longer, gathered evidence up front and then launched an
opinion. it will be appealed. beautifully written opinion. difficult to overturn on appeal. the gist of it is this. congress power to investigate is very broad. it s almost as important as its power to legislate. but it s not unlimited. congress can t infringe on the duties of the executive branch. can t engaging law enforcement. but those are very minor restraints on congress power. as long as there is a facially proper legislative purpose, the courts will not second guess even the motives of the congress folks in issuing these subpoenas or seeking this information. was this ruling based on that law from 1924 saying that members of congress can demand to see the taxes of any citizen of the united states? it goes back to the constitution, goes back to the power granted to congress to conduct investigations. as lone as those investigations are for a potential legislative purpose, they don t need be for
internal review on these practices. a bank that s been caught in a lot of inappropriate activity in recent years is wells fargo. they ve now announced they will fire up to 10% of the bank s workforce as part of a, quote, transformation. delta air lines is giving itself a face lift with technology. how soon will it work.? how soon can travelers expect these changes and do we want to be facially recognized and scanned? i don t know if i do. you love being facially recognized. we have this idea of being introduced as a test in mid october, hartsfield-jackson. what it means is you will enter your passport information ahead of time. you won t need a boarding pass, you ll get out of your cab, the train, the bus, you ll walk through a number of camera