it s sort of like protesters. protesters will say no justice, no peace. they re radicals banging on the door. this is the sitting president of the united states with all that power. when that person says no peace that s completely shocking. it goes to show how far we have sunk in under two years of this presidency that that wasn t the headline coming out of this state of the union. oh, yeah, trump threatening that if he s subject to normal oversight he will do some extralegal war. who knows what he s threatening. the fact he made this threat was somebody everybody rolled their eyes at because we have become so used to this behavior. john, michelle is using the word gangster. i m sure you remember a student of other criminal conduct master p who said is there heaven for a
that prison was the closest i ever hope to come to hell. prisoners will be caught, both sides. they ll be put into camps. as the war goes on then, these camps become overcrowded and they become virtual hellholes. the worst of the camps by far would be andersonville, in southwestern georgia, in which you have 45,000 soldiers in 26 acres. and death begins to stalk, in andersonville, one estimate of 100 soldiers dying a day. while soldiers rot in prison camps, confederate guerillas go to extremes to drive out northern invaders. there were guerillas and partisans in tennessee and in kentucky, missouri, states that were under union occupation, where you had extralegal, unofficial armies that would wage pretty savage campaigns.
criticizing elements of his own administration. acting like a spectator as if he s not the most powerful person in the government. doing things that are borderline kind of extralegal, like singling out a particular company. but you know, the larger question you asked in the open is the real one which is, is there an issue with american credibility when the president of the united states does this? let s remember that every president, republican or democrat, the one thing they have been very careful about is their words. there has been a sense that the united states, the president speaks with the credibility of the most powerful country in the history of the world. and now you have a president for whom words are weightless. they are like this kind of ghost. so he just pushes them out there, they mean nothing, he can change what he thinks about them. and if you ask does it have an effect on american credibility, let s remember what the criticism of barack obama was on
i read this open before about him going on a weekend twitter tie rate how many times? and the scattershot approach. the bizarre aspects of criticizing elements of his own administration. acting like a spectator as if he s not the most powerful person in the government. doing things that are borderline kind of extralegal, like singling out a particular company. but you know, the larger question you asked in the open is the real one which is, is there an issue with american credibility when the president of the united states does this? let s remember that every president, republican or democrat, the one thing they have been very careful about is their words. there has been a sense that the united states, the president speaks with the credibility of the most powerful country in the history of the world. and now you have a president for whom words are weightless. they are like this kind of