are prime ministers. satisfaction, i got out of that response. i hope you got it to, that is all the time i have heard today. alicia menendez, i will see you back here tomorrow for more american voices but for now, i handed over to my colleague ayman. i am in. i am in. i m so glad to close out the show with that because i saw that clip earlier this week and i m thinking to myself, my god, what a question. at first i thought he was, i thought it, was honestly, i thought it was going to be one of those gotcha parody moment questions. i didn t think he was a real journalist. and it turned out that he was a real journalist, and that was a sincere, genuine question on his part, and i just can t believe it. i genuinely can t believe it. i can believe it, and i love that she was prepared for it. it is much as that was extemporaneous, some part of her brain was, someone s gonna ask the derby question. and they did. if i was in her position i would have used, probably something not as d
because i saw that clip earlier this week and i m thinking to myself, my god, what a question. at first i thought he was, i thought it, was honestly, i thought it was going to be one of those gotcha parody moment questions. i didn t think he was a real journalist. and it turned out that he was a real journalist, and that was a sincere, genuine question on his part, and i just can t believe it. i genuinely can t believe it. i can believe it, and i love that she was prepared for it. do you know what i mean? it is much as that was extemporaneous, some part of her brain was, someone s gonna ask adobe question here, and they did. if i was in her position i would have used, probably something not as diplomatic or as political as she was. that s why she s the leader of that country, and i am not. alicia, thank you so much. always good to see you, my friend. enjoy your evening off. good evening to you. welcome to ayman tonight. republicans refused to condemn trump s dinner with a white sup
you hope that dialogue was picked up as well as to what they were saying that we can t do that or could you try this. we don t know if the camera was running, if it was done on an iphone, how it was recorded. the fact that he will obviously whatever is there was not released, he could say that i didn t want that out, that was a mistake, just an early take. he can get around that. but i think that it could show some of his thinking at least because apparently it was all extemporaneous. there were no speech writer hes inv involved, no process, just trump off the top like he was tweeting. but he was sending a video to try to deal with a situation that was far out of hand. and this was so underresponding to do that that speaks for itself too. right.
to spies and he used, you know how spies used to be treated when committing treason. they were executed. that do you think people who might be witnesses in this investigation? i thought that statement and as usual extemporaneous was reprehensible. i m not a lawyer, but it smacked to me of potential witness tampering. and it certainly is a chilling message to others who might consider being a whistle-blower. and the law governing, one of the features of it is to i m looking at some of the