going to look at the agreement that senator leahy made. the only reason i push on it, because it s an exigency. i understand that the appropriation season is upon us, but it s not something that can go through the normal process. there s too much risk. but senator amy klobuchar, you are always welcome on this show to argue your points of merit to the american people. good luck going forward. thank you very much. there s no reason to hide from the facts. it s about understanding what they mean. there s a big crowd for the president. i would actually differ with the senator, i don t think democrats are packing any place the way he is. and size does matter. but we have to look at what matters about the size. there is a lesson to be learned, next.
that came from. there are many places it could have come from but katherine herridge said she has been told that have been now for requests received by the agency but certainly it sounds like us attorney john durbin is looking into these origins under the direction of the attorney general, seems like he has wide latitude to go back to the start of this whole thing. i have to agree with john. there is nothing surprising here. william barr has service to term and it makes sense during would talk to cia folks and fbi folks etc.. it is anxiety and i see there s is it is not because of this report but the whole probe. i disagree with john, this is some sort of exigency when there are already two probes of this going on but this has been a duly raised talking point by the president and to date, to great disappointment, the attorney
we felt comfortable putting forward now, because the president sees the urgency and the exigency of border security. and we want to shine a light nobody in congress has botheredr to touch the legal immigration system in 54 years. they pretend they re worried about the children, present tend they re worried about the family. if they were, they would do something about girls at the ages of our borders, pumped up with birth control on the treacherous journey, tested for pregnancy. if they don t know what happens to those kids once they get here? laura: the kids were traumatized. of course they are, they come on that journey with nos guarantee, lied to by the coyotes who take their life savings and worse for many of them. the democrats want it as 2020 issue. we d like to resolve this in 2019. laura: any thought of reducing the number, 1.1 million, the president ran hard on reexamining that, steven miller was for lowering immigration, until we get the border issue solved.
this is two big fronts that we felt comfortable putting forward now, because the president sees the urgency and the exigency of border security. and we want to shine a light nobody in congress has bothered to touch the legal immigration system in 54 years. they pretend they re worried about the children, present tend they re worried about the family. if they were, they would do something about girls at the ages of our borders, pumped up with birth control on the treacherous journey, tested for pregnancy. if they don t know what happens to those kids once they get here laura: the kids were traumatized. of course they are, they come on that journey with no guarantee, lied to by the coyotes who take their life savings and worse for many of them. the democrats want it as 2020 issue. we d like to revolve 234i9 2019. laura: any thought of reducing the number, 1.1 million, the president ran hard on reexamining that, steven
is the system of law enforcement. when we look at the seismic shift in technology used in policing this has been germane and i can speak from personal experience as a practitioner. on many occasions i used facial recognition to bring success in comparing images into the database for mugshots so it is something that does help. when we consider exigency of privacy in a public place the average person is photograph 200 times a day. the truth of the matter is we don t have an expectation of privacy in public and that is what this facial recognition is doing, capturing images and comparing it against a database that we already have. we take into consideration the stopping of individuals with facial recognition. it merely amounts to reasonable suspicion. the police will cooperate if this individual was in fact involved with a particular crime. it is not automatic, it doesn t constitute probable cause to arrest someone. it really constitutes reasonable suspicion to conduct a stop and confront