Ciudadanos celebrará el lunes una reunión de la Ejecutiva Nacional diariosigloxxi.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from diariosigloxxi.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
interference and the bindens wee not u.s. policy. and as well, they have debunked any association that there was anything to the impropriety of the former vice president and the president of ukraine. the president of ukraine met all of the benchmarks and the aid should have been released. there was no need for this president, in essence, to try to make up his own policy. in his own statement of administrative policies, and i ask unanimous consent to have those in the record, this is from the white house. nothing in this said to discuss corruption. why? because ukraine had already met the standards of independent executive agencies that they had met that standard of corruption, their money should have been released. and we well know, as the process
policy. as well, they have debunked any association that there was anything to the impropriety of the former vice president and his service as it related to ukraine. i think it s important the department of defense and state department have confirmed ukraine met all anticorruption benchmarks and the aid should be released. that is the policy of the united states of america. there was no need for this president to in essence try to make up his own policy. in his own statement of administrative policies, and i ask unanimous consent to have those in the record, this is from the white house. nothing in this said to discuss corruption. why? because ukraine and already met the standards of independent executive agencies that they had met that standard of corruption. the money should have been
interference and the bidens were not u.s. policy and as well they have debunked any association there was anything to the impropriety of the former vice president and his service as related to ukraine. i think it is also important the department of defense and the state department confirm they have met all the anti-corruption benchmarks and the aid should be released. that s the policy of the united states of america. there was no need for this president to, in essence, try to make up his own policy. in his own statement of administrative policies, and i ask unanimousnd consent to ask have those in the record this is from the white house. nothing in this said to discuss corruption. why? because ukraine had already met the standards of independent executive agencies that they met that standard of corruption, their money should have been
historically relevant? that s such a great question, ali. and we can have a whole constitutional law class on that. but the bottom line is in cases involving discrimination against minorities, the court is will being to go affecting economic relations, there are laws involving administrative decisions like this. generally courts are pretty deferential to executive agencies, and that s what the conservative justices said. what s significant here is the court was willing to look for evidence of real motive, even though it was an executive agency decision, and i think that s because they found the evidence so overwhelmingly powerful. they said that there has to be some review. the reason this debate is so significant is because in other cases conservative justices say that courts should not be too deferential, seeming to call into question the constitutionality of the entire regulatory state. so the question you ve identified, how much should courts look behind a law to figure out the