mueller has not concluded the investigation. if you re going to open, open big. you don t open, you re not going to open this has been going on for how many monmonth many m. the phrase i would use is go big or go home and in this case, mueller has not gone home and he s gotten over 300 different charnls that have been filed. i wouldn t conflate the issue of saying because there has not be a direct connection to donald trump, and by robert mueller s team, does not mean there has not been clus between members of the campaign including people like paul manafort and rick gates and michael flynn and you have that con flags to say that nothing has happened. paul manafort of the 35 witnesses, i mean, sure you look ed at them. not one are are from the campaign. in that one case. you see this shifting of goal posts, you are still talking about how there was no collusion. but there are a number people,
dear born, someone from russia sat next to don jr. there has been shown interactions between russian individuals and the campaign which have consistently, you know, the most significant of which being the trump tower meeting, consistently being brushed away as this doesn t necessarily prove collusion. it does with a foreign entity. when don jr. responds to an e-mail and says if it s what you say, i like it, the first e-mail he got, part of russia s effort to swik the election to you. i m not a prosecutor, not prosecuting him for that. but there s a lot of smoke coming out of that gun. to follow that up, the clus thing, right, it has been proven that there has been collusion. the issue is, is this type of collusion illegal? we don t know yet. we don t know. we haven t gotten to the bottom of it yet. i think what is so dangerous about the flynn thing for donald trump is that and again this hasn t been proven yet. when did donald trump know that
obamacare is a failed experiment. that s why we want to change the structure of the health care delivery system as we stabilize markets, protect people from premium increases, and preexisting conditions exclus exclusions. we re going to continue down that road because the alternative, i fear, is going to be a democratic effort, strictly to bail out insurance companies with no reform whatsoever. after seven years of obamacare, the american public knows what they have. they have fewer choices. they have higher premiums and less control over their own health care. number of years ago, i voted to do a repeal of the obama health care law. i am ready to make that complete repeal vote again. but of course that s not enough. the people of wyoming want more than that. they want to be able to buy the insurance that they want, that works right for them, not what the federal government in washington, d.c., says they have to buy. so, i m ready to vote to repeal,
imdiaty. one of the biggest problems for the government, before the three-judge panel and occur before the supreme court is all the burdens are now on the government. they have all shifted because of what judge row bart did and the emergency basis they are trying to remedy this. i hope the trump administration substitutes five or six more discreet, more targeted orders for this executive order, most of which would be not only bullet proof legally, but not reviewable because over 99% of the people affected by the order have never been to the united states, have no visa, no current permission to come to the united states and have no family in the united states. they have no one to sue for them and they cannot sue. the president would successfully exclus over 99% of the people he is trying to put through an extreme vetting process and the other discreet portions of american population and the world population that are
but there is a very clerical clus here, not just on family side, the personal side. also the money side. think about hillary clinton s don t ares, right? the clinton world has been known for a long time about, you know, keeping their enemies close and making sure that people stay on their side. so you re not going to see a situation like you do on the republican side where donors are giving to two candidates at the same time. i think that s really one of biggest factors here for joe biden. he s got staff out there that want to work for him. he s got, you know, the ability to pull a ground game together really quickly. question is whether or not donors will give to him without fear of retribution from clinton s campaign. what about just from money, jeff zeleny, to the thrust of his campaign? you talked about this letter from senator coffman to the biden network. what more have we gleaned from that as far as platform campaign? i know it s an optimistic