sealed and that leads to the possibility of what could have occurred is what they then tampered with the ballots themselves and sent them in. indeed, one of the people in charge of this effort, supposedly, is a gentleman who was in fact a consultant with mark harris, the republican candidate s, campaign, who is ahead, but only by about 900 vote. this goes all the way back to the primary. robert pettinger got defeated in the primary by mark harris and there are credible allegations there that in fact there might have been tampering. right now, we re just talking about the general election. incredible. to be clear, invariably with a story like this, you ll have partisan claims that, well, this is one party trying to skew the facts here, but the fact is, the election board here, a bipartisan board, and it voted 7-2 not to certify these results as a result of these allegations. what evidence led them to do so? and crucially, does this mean
investigating the clinton foundation, looking into whether members were promised favors or access to hillary clinton when she was secretary of state. this has been brewing for years. it s unclear what if any new evidence led to the current investigation. the official says it s being led by an fbi field office in arkansas. back with the panel, maria, as a democrat and former adviser to secretary clinton, what do you see? i agree with what nick merrell said today, it s a total sham. i think this is something we could have predicted. we saw this coming miles away. frankly, probably in jeff sessions attempt to prove his loyalty, there is something that he did to prove his loyalty. a total sham? really? yes, absolutely. paris? how do you see it? this has been investigated before, and they re going to come up with nothing. i wish i could take everything you said about the president and that investigation in russia and flip it and talk about secretary clinton because it would be
tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. a u.s. official tells cnn federal authorities are actively investigating the clinton foundation, looking into whether members were promised favors or access to hillary clinton when she was secretary of state. this has been brewing for years. it s unclear what if any new evidence led to the current investigation. the official says it s being led by an fbi field office in arkansas. back with the panel, maria, as a democrat and former adviser to secretary clinton, what do you see? i agree with what nick merrell said today, it s a total sham. i think this is something we all could have predicted. we saw this coming miles away. frankly, probably in jeff sessions attempt to prove his
serious flaws. according to the article, mueller has a record that shows a man of fallible judgment who can be slow to alter his chosen course. the article goes on to criticize his handling of the 2001 anthrax case while mueller was serving as the director of the fbi. the report reads, his tenacious yet linear approach to evaluating evidence led him to fumble the biggest u.s. terrorism investigation since 9/11. now, of course, this is the very same robert mueller who stood by and did nothing when he was the director of the fbi while the controversial sale of uranium one was being approved by hillary clinton, eric holders, and others in 2010. keep in mind, in 2009, the fbi had evidence of russian bribery linked to uranium one. remember, a confidential informant provided further evidence of a potentially illicit deal. 18 months before. where 20% of america s
profile of mueller highlighting many of his serious flaws. according to the article, quote, mueller has a record that shows a man of fallible judgment who can be slow to alter his chosen course. the article goes on to criticize his handling of the 2001 anthrax case while mueller was serving as the director of the fbi. the report reads, quote: his tenacious yet linear approach to evaluating evidence led him to fumble the biggest u.s. terrorism investigation since 9/11. now, of course, this is the very same robert mueller who stood by and did nothing when he was the director of the fbi while the controversial sale of uranium one was being approved by hillary clinton, eric holders and others in 2010. keep in mind in 2009, the fbi had evidence of russian bribery linked to uranium one. remember, a confidential informant provided further evidence of a potentially illicit deal? 18 months before.