thank you. congress returned from a two-week recess, just in tim for the jim jordan showed to hit the road house judiciary committee le by ohio congressman jim jordan arrived in new york city today with a hearing that they calle victims of violent crimes in manhattan. the hearing was not to propose or advance any republica policy to combat violent crime in manhattan, the purpose of the hearing was to examine how it manhattan district attorney alvin bragg pro crime, ant victim collett - and dangerous community for ne york city residents. by attempting to undermine the new york prosecutor who charge donald trump with 34 felonies, jim jordan is making it clea that the victim that he trul cares about is donald trump. jim jordan is all in on th trump defense fund raising grift. he was pitching republican donors on his tax against th district attorney bragg in tennessee last week. and thankfully, for the quote, hard earned money. in tennessee, last week, day after 39 year old child
tough day and kansas city. i was glad we were able to get him. indeed. we ll talk about it a little later on in the show thank you congress returned from two-week recess just in time for the jim jordan show to hit the road house judiciary committee le by ohio congressman jim jordan arrived in new york city today with a hearing that they calle victims of violent crimes in manhattan. the hearing was not to propose or advance any republica policy to combat violent crime in manhattan, the purpose of the hearing was to examine how manhattan district attorne alvin bragg s pro crime, ant victim policies have led t increased crime and dangerou community for new york cit residents. by attempting to undermine the new york prosecutor who charge donald trump with 34 felonies, jim jordan is making it clea that the victim that he trul cares about is donald trump. jim jordan is all in on th trump defense fund raising grift. he was pitching republican donors on his attacks agains the d
morning, everyone it is saturday . april 8th. i m amro walker. i m victor blackwell. you are in the cnn newsroom and we begin with the abortion debate across the country. this time, it s over access to medication. abortion after federal courts issued conflicting rulings began after a federal judge in texas ruled to suspend the fda s two decade old approval. of method. pistone then washington state judge ruled the fda must keep the pill on the shelves and 17 democratic states and the district of columbia. cnn s senior medical correspondent, elizabeth cohen joins us now. so explain what medford press stone is and what happens next. so victor medford. redstone is one of two drugs that are used in medicated abortions. in other words, abortions that are used by pill rather than by a surgical procedure. as you said they ve been used safely from more than 20 years. they have an excellent safety profile, and actually, they are now quite common. let s take a look at what s happened wi
joined some congressiona democrats calling for the do to investigate thomas for hi nondisclosure s in a filin today. he wrote that circumstance surrounding concealment of these reportable items strongly support the conclusio that these violations of the law we re going, and what were the circumstances you re referring to one of the bigges circumstances is that justic thomas declare disclosed thi kind of attempts before. until an embarrassing 2004 article came out in the l.a. times, and then he stopped disclosing them. then there is the fact that th law is absolutely clear on this none of this is ambiguous, contrary to what he and hi defenders would have you think then there is simply the fac that other justices have disclosed these kinds of things, and then a final circumstanc is that every one of those supervising ethics offices i the government, one for each branch, to in the congress they have issued very plai
to investigate thomas for hi nondisclosure s in a filin today. you wrote that circumstances surrounding concealment of these reportable items strongly support the conclusio that these violations of the law we re going, and what were the circumstances you re referring to one of the bigges circumstances is that justic thomas disclosed this kind o attempts before. until an embarrassing 2004 article came out in the l. a times, and then he stopped disclosing them. then there is the fact that th law is absolutely clear on this none of this is ambiguous, contrary to what he and hi defenders would have you think then there is simply the fac that other justices have disclosed these kinds of things, and then a final circumstanc is that every one of those supervising ethics offices i the government, one for each