Colleagues could i have a motion to accept the amendments, so moved. And in the underlying item, and motion to approve. You can do so without objection. And madam clerk, could you call item 9 . Item 9, is an ordinance authorizing the office of the city and administrator to accept and expand a grant in the amount of 440,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation to hire a officer for San Francisco, and amending ordinance, 16013 to reflect the addition of one grant Fund Position in class, 0933 at the office of the city. Ordinance authorizing the office of the city administrator to accept and expend a grant in the amount of 440,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation to hire a chief resilience officer for San Francisco, and amending ordinance no. 16013 annual salary ordinance, fys 20132014 and 20142015 to reflect the addition of one grantfunded position . 25 fte in class 0933, manager v, at the office of the city administrator, for the period of april 1, 2014, through march 31, 2016. In order to hir
Where to make these amendments, but id like to like numeral six to delete the word appears and put the word meets. Motion . Seconded. Thank you. Commissioners on that motion to adopt recommendation of approval as amended to remove in item six, appears to, and change the word meet to meets. And adding publicly accessible interpretive display to the project. Just to clarify to make sure the recommendation is clear for the board of supervisors, i would recommend that the commission recommend the ordinance be amended to require a publicly accessible display as part of the landmark designation, that way the City Attorney can put that language directly into the ordinance to enforce it. Fine, agreed. Is that acceptable to seconder . Yes. On that motion, commissioner johnck. Yes. Jones. Yes. Matsuda yes. Pearlman. Yes. Wolfram. Yes. Hasz. Yes. That motion passes unanimously six to zero. There are no other items on your agenda. Thank you. We will adjourn this meeting. What if you could make a m
Alternates they were approved as a part of the july project alternate 4 was added later than. It had all the for 48. 7 million they submitted a bid into through that and the bids are evaluated on the plus bids and the alternates. Its recommended that we accept the deduct alternates 13 and reject 4 it provides a structural architecture concrete finish number two, of providing a set of concrete the bid parts for this particular alternate is 64 hundred dollars and 3. 4 million and this a alternate is you much more than 64 Million Dollar and we ask you reject this and possibility discuss it with shimming any questions and is what caused the higher prices. Its solely recommended that the project be w5ur9d to show me any questions theyve submitted a fair and reasonable bid. Their bid taking a look at according to what we think the reduced costs or the costs savings with the mobiletion since theyre on the dock side he construction of the below grounded concrete. The market code continues t co
Department heads sitting in a room we dont a wide range of decision making. Do the Department Heads have the same Eligible Fund they can fund with the fund but do you see a real difference in terms of what gets funded in other places compared to San Francisco in terms of training being done or what kind of work is being done to engage more residents. Is there a program like that. When it comes to engaging residents one of the things that San Francisco is on the cuttingedge of is using the funding to improve our region and we had a meeting were going a web based program for folks which are safe i didnt on the internet. Well allow this Community Outreach to be improved and the funds fund the program in San Francisco and fund similar thirjz things in other community. Not everybody wants or needs the same thing some spend more on equipment and some on training. Ill also is a some communities dont have the robust funds were pretty good at it we know how to spend the money and not give it ba
The meeting will come to order good morning, everyone this is the San Francisco Transportation Authority plans Programs Committee this is the meeting of tuesday, march 18, 2014. Our clerk is erica chang could you please call the roll supervisor breed. Supervisor kim. Supervisor mar. Supervisor yee. laughter thank you id like to thank Jessie Larson and others for brooet us on sfgovtv. Item 12 the Citizens Advisory Council report. I know that supervisor kim was going to make comments about the unfortunate news of joseph passing. Actually, i was going to do any memoriam at the full Board Meeting i was hoping after the Committee Report we could have a moment of silence this is a time of vice chair flanagan used to do his report and bryan larkin from the cac. Im sorry supervisor campos. I know were going to do something at the board but i want to acknowledge mr. Flanagan i know he really cared about this agency and i have yet to find anyone that is more passionate about serving people and w