a couple of holdouts initially, and they are now of one of cord. shannon: do you think maybe they were convinced, whatever the disagreement was, if there was a disagreement, they asked for the pecker testimony and the cohen testimony, the rereading of the jury instructions, do you think the fact that we didn t hear from them again after that, that that one section or that one conflict was what they needed to get to something now? i think the jury instruction was pretty pro-prosecution. i think a lot of the evidentiary rulings were pro-prosecution. so what you are going to get with a verdict is pretty much what you ve gotten up to that point. what are the rulings? what evidence has come in? what evidence has been excluded? so the expert they never heard from. the jury is only as good as the information they are getting. shannon: well, so that gets to my question, you all having and you have handled some very high-profile cases. is there a situation when afterwards juro