and allow them to have any enrichment capability. and it will lejiet myself the state sponsor of terrorism. and profoundly destabilizing the agreement. and it threatens our close ally israel and our arab friend. it is a surrinneder of classic porportions. we ll make sure we have audio coming from switzerland. we ll listen here. all of the others that are negotiating. we the european union representativive and the foreign minister of the islamic republic of iran together with the e3 plus three. china france, germany, russian federation united kingdom and united states met from 26th
and the president rohani sent out a tweet that major perimeters were agreed to and two-thirds of iran s enrichment capabilities would be sidelined. that sounds welcome. suspended is what they call it. it can be turned on quickly and rests on the assumption that we in the west know what their enrichment capability is. we can t say that with certainty. iran is trying to make minimal easily reversible concession. and want to be free of the economic sanctions, but they are not going to do anything and have not done anything that undercuts their ability to get to an expensive arsenal of nuclear weapons at a short
if his goal is to attempt to form a cooperative relationship with iran which many suspect he has not admitted, we need to know that as well. right now the evidence is from yemen tikrit iraq and from syria that iran is on the move, challenging our friends and allies throughout the region. and this is contributing to this accepts of chaos that you described so well. well you mentioned i mean, we have talked about iran. we have no idea what this agreement might be or if there is going to be an agreement. of course israel prime minister netanyahu said at the very beginning he has no tolerance for his nation for any enrichment capability of iran. it looks like we will strike some deal that will give some capabilities just not nuclear weapons capabilities. that s exactly what it is. if it s successful as i understand it, we will push iran back to a one-year breakout period, assuming inspectors and other monitoring has worked. it has not worked in the past.
need for infrastructure that will lead to a north korean outcome where you give them an industrial size enrichment capability. the u.n. fails to contain it. and when they say they re not trying to build a bomb i think they re lying. so i much rather not have a deal than lock in place what would be a eventually a north korean outcome. so a bad deal is off the table, no deal is better than a bad deal. people say that. i believe it. now, but when it comes to iran, how important do you believe iran is right now in the fight against isis in iraq? well, i think they re important in destabilizing the region. they re not helping because of freedom or democracy or anything else. they just toppled the government in yemen by supporting the the shia militia on the ground are creating war crimes inside iraq. assad is the puppet of iran. they re not an ally to anybody in the region. no sunni arab state sees iran as an ally and i certainly don t.
table. what the prime minister spoke about things as a matter of public record that you can google. you mentioned the sunset clause and for viewers who don t understand what thatt means the deal would be negotiated would within a certain amount of years w remove the special restrictions n that are going to be put in placere in iran s nuclear program and they would be like th any other in the world like a japan. they have industrial enrichment capability. the problem was we couldn t have an iran that would not be like japan is today like the regime japan had 70 years ago that s the danger. thatat is why the prime minister makes itt clear.. this was new about his speech. a lot of people maybe did not see hit. what the prime minister said you have to linke the removal of those restrictions on iran s nuclear program to a change in iran s behavior. they have to stop the aggression around they region and terrorism aroundt the world and stop threatening to annihilate t israel. if they act lik