russia. this is the convulsion of putin and he uses the propaganda as a separate weapon. we do not trust put in and that is why this weapon is useless. in put in and that is why this weapon is useless. , ., put in and that is why this weapon is useless is useless. in terms of the patriot s stem, is useless. in terms of the patriot system. in is useless. in terms of the patriot system, in terms is useless. in terms of the patriot system, in terms of is useless. in terms of the patriot system, in terms of clarity - is useless. in terms of the patriot system, in terms of clarity on - is useless. in terms of the patriot system, in terms of clarity on the i system, in terms of clarity on the numbers, how many patriot systems are now on the ground, in theatre, working? it are now on the ground, in theatre, workin: ? , , ., working? it is definitely not enou~h, working? it is definitely not enough. point working? it is definitely not enough, point number - working? it is definitely n
and they america taken together. and they work harder. so who is going to win this long term? so the right strategy is to actually negotiate with china, do deals with china. so whilst we still have something to bargain for, we get a better deal with china may be for china to produce some of its factories in europe and the us. produce some of its factories in europe and the us. which is fair enou~h, europe and the us. which is fair enough. but europe and the us. which is fair enough. but i europe and the us. which is fair enough, but i wonder, - europe and the us. which is fair enough, but i wonder, do - europe and the us. which is fair enough, but i wonder, do you . europe and the us. which is fair. enough, but i wonder, do you think is some do that there is a risk, a real risk that the chinese could take the compound semiconductor technology and use it for military purposes? technology and use it for military uroses? , , ., technology and use it for military uroses? , , ., ., p
qualified engineers than europe and america taken together. and they work harder. so who is going to win this long term? so the right strategy is to actually negotiate with china, do deals with china. so whilst we still have something to bargain for, we get a better deal with china may be for china to produce some of its factories in europe and the us. produce some of its factories in europe and the us. which is fair enou~h, europe and the us. which is fair enough. but europe and the us. which is fair enough. but i europe and the us. which is fair enough, but i wonder, - europe and the us. which is fair enough, but i wonder, do - europe and the us. which is fair enough, but i wonder, do you . europe and the us. which is fair. enough, but i wonder, do you think is some do that there is a risk, a real risk that the chinese could take the compound semiconductor technology and use it for military purposes? technology and use it for military reuroses? , , ., ., purposes? yes, there is
re inquiry. it s really open up only a few weeks ago, but that dialogue has been encouraging. we ve heard the outcome today in terms of the refunds, but the reality is the refund is good, but reform of uefa is the goal here. they have to implement the full 21 recommendations which they now agreed to do, but obviously our commitment now is to ensure that we hold them to that. hold them to that. we ve had this re ort hold them to that. we ve had this report that hold them to that. we ve had this report that points hold them to that. we ve had this report that points to hold them to that. we ve had this report that points to what - hold them to that. we ve had this report that points to what will. report that points to what will hopefully be learned from what happened and these refunds now too. is it enough? it’s happened and these refunds now too. is it enough? is it enough? it s obsolete not enou~h, is it enough? it s obsolete not enough. it s is it enough? it s obsolete
# lets make it a christmas time for all! to make sensible of that let s speak to matt charlton. you missed it the most important bit there, you missed a gem. most important bit there, you missed a em. ,~ most important bit there, you missed a cem ,~ ., most important bit there, you missed a cem , ., ., ., a gem. sorry about that, i have something a gem. sorry about that, i have something in a gem. sorry about that, i have something in my a gem. sorry about that, i have something in my ears. - a gem. sorry about that, i have something in my ears. there i a gem. sorry about that, i havel something in my ears. there are enou~h, something in my ears. there are enough. i m something in my ears. there are enough, i m sure something in my ears. there are enough, i m sure that something in my ears. there are enough, i m sure that is - something in my ears. there are enough, i m sure that is the - something in my ears. there are| enough, i m sure that is the only reason for it. co