was richard nixon right when he said when a president does it, that means it s not illegal? well. a judge may have just said in one very specific and important way that, yeah, he might be right. tonight sara wallace says that donald trump gets to stay on the pilot in colorado. this despite the judge finding and saying in pretty plain english that donald trump engaged in an insurrection. during the january 6th attack on the united states capitol. now, the court found that trump intended to incite political violence, that trump wanted to direct it at the capitol, and that trump s plan was to stop the peaceful transfer of power. and that trump was not, in fact, protected by the first amendment when he said that. we are going to walk down to the capitol and we re gonna cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women and we re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. because you ll never take back our country with weakness. you have to show strength. w
tonight cnn is learning that rosalynn carter has now entered hospice care in her home in georgia. the first lady had been diagnosed with dementia and a new statement from the carter center we found that she and her husband former president jimmy carter are spending time with each other and their families. former president is 99. he transition ed to hospice care nine months ago. they are the longest married presidential couple in u.s. history. we are thinking of them and their family tonight. thank you so much for joining us, each and every night this week, cnn news night with abby phillips starts now. did a judge just suggest that donald trump is above the law? that s tonight on news night. good evening, i m abby phillip in washington and we start the hour with a question. was richard nixon actually right when he said when a president does it that means it s not illegal? well a judge may have just said in one very specific and important way that yeah, he might be
region here in japan and south korea. and nations around the world. and china. from a diplomatic standpoint, is there any circumstance where you can see direct negotiations happening? should they happen? first, it s interesting that the policy pronouncement that we re moving from strategic patience from active pressure and engagement. we don t know what that engagement means. we ve seen the active pressure part of it. i don t see direct talks starting without some sort of commitment by the north koreans to either seize testing or taking some sort of other action. i was watching today show this morning and he had something interesting to say to willie geist. i want you to listen to that and then talk about it. if the war was over here, itt wouldn t be over here. it would be the end of north korea, but what it would not do is hit america. the only way it could oever com