be inflamed by racial bias and other errors that were committed in the central park case. how has the rhetoric differed in this time around compared to back in 1989. sure when the central park five calm along, they were labelled the wolf pack. the city hated these kids. it was part of the hysteria of the moment in rising crime. here you have law enforcement officials, the public and everyone, asking the police to be very careful. these are kids. they re being referred to as kids and not monsters. is there a sense the city is, you know, changing anything, altering anything to this going forward? when you say altering, do you mean enforcement practices? yeah, exactly. okay. the city has said that it has learned from the mistakes of central park five although it doesn t really admit any. but you can see from the interrogation with the young people with their parents
in 2015, the judge overseeing that case determined that the settlement actually covers kids who are part of families, as well. at the time, we, i opposed that ruling. and we argued then that it would constrain enforcement policy. so just to be clear, you re saying on policy, some of these republicans do have a point that there are sort of grandfathered in restrictions that make it harder to actually be humanitarian about where to put these people. i believe that our enforcement practices, detention practices which should be fair and humane should be regulated by the executive branch, not a federal district court in los angeles. there are ways to do that, but in the overheated rhetoric right now, we ll never get there. let me get you on someone you used to work with. he wouldn t say whether or not the go back statement violates dhs protocol.
or did the cia spy on the senate? well, ts back to what this entire issue is about. a senate report and the conduct conducted under the previous administration that the president outlawed on his first day in office. we provided millions of pages to the senate and the president is urging the committee to finish the report as soon as possible. there are allegations on both sides referred to the appropriate authorities to the inspector general and the department of justice. we ll let them get to the bottom of it. you re not prepared to say whether the head of the cia john brennan should an poize? let s let them get to the bottom of what happened. about immigration, the president s supporters in some quarters have taken to calling him the deporter in chief. some 2 million deportations under his tenure and counting. will he take executive action to do anything to sole those deportations? the president has asked his secretary of homeland security to look at our current enforcement
or did the cia spy on the senate? well, ts back to what this entire issue is about. a senate report and the conduct conducted under the previous administration that the president outlawed on his first day in office. we provided millions of pages to the senate and the president is urging the committee to finish the report as soon as possible. there are allegations on both sides referred to the appropriate authorities to the inspector general and the department of justice. we ll let them get to the bottom of it. you re not prepared to say whether the head of the cia john brennan should an poize? let s let them get to the bottom of what happened. about immigration, the president s supporters in some quarters have taken to calling him the deporter in chief. some 2 million deportations under his tenure and counting. will he take executive action to do anything to sole those deportations? the president has asked his secretary of homeland security to look at our current enforcement
let s let them get to the bottom of what happened. let me ask you about immigration. the president s supporters in some quarters have taken to calling him the deportor in chief. some 2 million deportations under his tenure and counting. will the president take executive action to do anything to slow those deportations? the president has asked his secretary of homeland security to look at our current enforcement practices and see how we can enforce them more humanly within the constraints of the law. that is the right thing to do because the president that would mean slowing down it would be enforcing them more humanely. give me an example what that could be. what that means is i m not going to prejudge the results of secretary johnson s review. but it means looking at how focusing our resources towards folks crossing the border, towards criminals, and the president is he feels the pain of the community. the separation in the community from our broken system. here s