or form. and i said this the other night when i hosted hannity that it is so, to me, stunning that a supreme court justice would come out and push back at the president of the united states. you know, the president is political. the supreme court justice is not, especially the chief justice. let s talk about the ninth circuit and what we have got and how this circuit is, you know, considered almost a circus given their decisions. right. well, we call it the 9th circus his or her it stretches from alaska to almost the equat eequate eequat. we can t even get en banc hearing. we are stacked up and can t even get en banc hearing and quite frankly arizona and the inner mountain west, we are not really copasetic with the california mentality and coastal mentality. i have a bill to split up the ninth circuit.
involved in any way, shape, or form. and i said this the other night when i hosted hannity that it is so, to me, stunning that a supreme court justice would come out and push back at the president of the united states. you know, the president is political. the supreme court justice is not, especially the chief justice. let s talk about the ninth circuit and what we have got and how this circuit is, you know, considered almost a circus given their decisions. right. well, we call it the 9th circus his or her it stretches from alaska to almost the equat eequate eequat. we can t even get en banc hearing. we are stacked up and can t even get en banc hearing and quite frankly arizona and the inner mountain west, we are not really copasetic with the california mentality and coastal mentality. i have a bill to split up
or form. and i said this the other night when i hosted hannity, that it is so, to me, stunning that a supreme court justice would come outre and push back at the president of the united states. you know, the president is political.l. the supreme court justice is not, especially the chief justice. let s talk about the ninth circuit and what we have got and how this circuit is, you know, considered almost a circus given their decisions. right. well, we call it the 9th circus here. it stretches from alaska to almost the equator. it is by far thee biggest. we can t even get en banc hearing. we are stacked up and can t get an en banc hearing and quite frankly arizona and the inner mountain west, we are not really copasetic with the california mentality and the coastal mentality. i have a bill to split up the ninth circuit. we can t seem to get any
oral argument? the eight-hour oral argument? we did have one in an en banc case two years ago that went all afternoon. before we got back to the conference rooms i don t think anyone was saying we should do that in every case. understood. understood. let s talk about judicial philosophy for a minute. i would like to discuss federalist 78. in federalist 78, hamilton discusses the dichotomy between will on the one hand and judgment on the other. will being something that is exercised by the political branches, primarily by the congress, by the legislative branch, and judgment being something exercised by the judicial branch. what s the difference between tows two? the judicial branch is deciding cases or controversies according to law. the legislative branch is making the policy, exercising the will.
and saying a prayer, president trump tweeted about that twice saying this shouldn t happen in our country. the baker case, there is a en banc on friday. you have two courts of appeals going the opposite way whether county commissioners can pray to open their meetings. 2018 is going to be a huge religious freedom here. shannon: you see these cases, others within the military. rights of servicemen and women. to the point about the baker case, a lot of people get stuck there because they say how can you come down on the side of being against lgbt rights. they were denied a custom wedding cake. the supreme court said it was humiliating for them and they are fighting to make sure no one else has to go through that. dominic holden always of buzzf,