access to technology, and i think over the next ten years, one of the big trends that people need to pay attention to is how all of these now innovations, new technologies, new companies, really are being tightly centered in places like san francisco, new york, washington, d.c., at the expense of all of these other communities which is one of the reasons you get so much sort of upheaval and people who don t feel like they re sharing in the wealthy. and that goes back to what you said earlier, the president is going to use those divisions, people who live in cities, versus those who live in rural areas. for sure. if you look at the politics of people in big cities, almost every big city is governed by a liberal. very few republicans run cities because they are running for the hills, they don t want to be anywhere near liberals, they are living in the country or suburbs, it s why you get the red blue map, and why you have so much emotionalism in our
vision of border security? what does that mean? let s get away from the emotionalism for a second. both sides are really stoking up their bases with this issue. which is what makes it less solvable. if she believes there should be border security, if she believes in the type of sovereignty she advertised in the past, what does that mean? she has to spell it out. she is no longer a reactor. it s much more fun to be the minority part where you just react to everything. she is in charge now. that s not her role at this point. if she is going to take the lead on this, tell us what you are going to do. tell us how you will make people in border states feel better about the vulnerabilities they have. it s time to lay a topic. they say we don t need walls. we need technology. i am dying to ask someone on the other side, can you explain to me in rational, sane terms for
weapons that no one should have and there are some people out there who should not be allowed to have any weapons. and we can do that and still remain true to the second amendment. i mean, that s just such a tough one because this person was a vet. he, i believe, had a gun legally, but then he came back and had mental health issues. the question is what do you do with that situation? again, we re very sensitive to our liberties. the constitution is fairly explicit. we push back stronger than even our western european or canadian friends with regard to government intervention in these kinds of matters. but as you point out, the statistics speak for themselves. we re not doing this right. and we need to have an honest discussion without this reflective emotionalism that we get when anyone brings up the question about limiting what kinds of weapons people should get or who should get weapons.
you re about chaos here s the thing. now it s interesting because democrats line is we don t need due process. they want to turn the senate into a circus. they want to do away with roberts rule of order and any parliamentary procedure because it s inconvenient for them. that means leftists, for me, it s not about party. it s about emotionalism versus rati rationalism. they let their facts and claims speak for them. when that fails, and that s the case in the kavanaugh hearing that s when you resort to this kind of emotionalism. it s an abdication of personal responsibility because people no longer feel like they have to comport themselves like rational human beings. i thought martha maccallum
extend my condolences to the families and the victims this weekend. chicago was out of control. our violence right now is the 21st century version of the chicago fire of 1871. mary emanuel and his handpicked superintendent have admitted in that press conference that they cannot handle what they have been entrusted, voted in and appointed to do. this violence will be epidemic and if there are reasons that it is so violent, but it is reaching epidemic proportions. the mayhem this weekend is really beyond the emotionalism that he shows, and the cries are bloodied because he wipes them with what he hands. sandra: after the great chicago fire, we all know those of us born and raised in the city, it s the second city because it built itself. canonicity be fixed? what needs to happen to bring