even u.s. attorney john durham. where does this go next, jeff? it s an astounding list. chairman intelligence chairman richard adam schiff, excuse me today after the hearing ended told us reporters that this investigation, the whistle-blower complaint really provides his team with many avenues and he says probably investigate any number of those material witnesses but here is the thing, chuck. i think in politics as you well know and we ve talked before about how impeachment is a political remedy here, timing and messaging account for a lot. and the takeaway that we re getting from house democrats, they believe this ukraine controversy provides the best case as they try to quickly build their public argument against president trump. and they say that even as these six committees will continue their investigative work looking into things like emoluments
division amongst the ranks? some will say we should go forward with impeachment, some will say take steps towards impeachment and others no, hold your horses, that is not a good idea. will the democrats be able to get on the same page? well, i don t know where we re going to end up but the media always wants to know what s the final destination. if i knew i would love to tell you. we re in an educational process. we re education ourselves about what constitution says and how bad the president turning the government into a for profit business. holding these investigations and talking about emoluments violation, profiting off the presidency, talking about a number of the other ethical issues that you have under your gei guise, are you holding impeachment hearings without calling them impeachment hearings? we re giving the public the information they need because we re a democracy and the people need to know the character of our rulers and government and public policy and where it s
was it solely on the question of lie, potentially, to the fbi, or were there other aspects of what you heard from robert mueller that moved you to where you are now? well, that was certainly one of the factors, but it s been accumulation of things that really led me to this point. the fact that they have not answered our questions. they have not provided information. they won t come and testify. hiding behind executive privilege. all of that in addition to the mueller testimony. and also, i m trying to conduct a study on the emoluments violation with the hotel and they just stonewalled us as well. and the people who are calling me here in my district in las vegas since the mueller television investigation have just increased in number and intensity in favor of this moving forward with this impeachment inquiry. you got to a question i wanted to ask you. so before robert mueller testified, did you hear a lot from your constituents about impeachment? did it increase after mueller
attack on our democracy and ordering the staff to do the same are serious crimes. joining us now is congresswoman dina titus from the great state of nevada. thanks very much for joining us. you are now off the fence and you say it was robert mueller s testimony that moved you in that direction. was it solely on the question of lying, potentially, to the fbi, or were there other aspects of what you heard from robert mueller that moved you to where you are now? well, that was certainly one of the factors, but it s been accumulation of things that really led me to this point. the fact that they have not answered our questions. they have not provided information. they won t come and testify. hiding behind executive privilege. all of that in addition to the mueller testimony. and also i m trying to conduct a study on the emoluments violation with the hotel and they just stonewalled us as well. and the people who are calling me here in my district in las vegas since the mueller televisio