Needed between us. Well, i would encourage both agencies to perhaps engage on more frequent conversations. Maybe that could expedite some of the questions and maybe some of the questions would be resolved more quickly because there is more clarity given on something but that is just a suggestion but going back to the puc, just a general comment. I think its important to clarify the questions raised and i agree with our counsel its good to have this kind of discussion. The one thing that i hope though and i dont think this is its not directed at one individual or individuals for that matter, but i really hope that there is a real effort to expedite this and move this forward, and that some of the questions, which quite frankly to me they seem more about form over substance; that some of the questions dont get in the of delaying how this moves forward, and just provide some context. We are here because the puc, the commission was not able or willing to set rates, and i think its in some
Use the same metric that the enernex report uses per million spent we had about. 4. 42 jobs and those are actual construction jobs on the site measured through the citys elation system. Sure. I dont want to get into and the enernex report says you could have five to seven i think jobs per million spent and, construction job is what the title says and its just that kind of huh that kind of conversation that i am referring to. I want to make sure there werent substantive concerns that you perhaps didnt present today. No. There wasnt a substantive conversation. It was really just a preview of what the report covers, a preview of the comments we had at the staff level about the report. We have not had a briefing to our commissioners of the draft. We have been asked to put together a briefing of this version. Now, it sounds like mr. Fried refers to as the final version so that seems the version to have a briefing with the commissioners with and thats what were planning on doing. Were planni
Jobs and those are actual construction jobs on the site measured through the citys elation system. Sure. I dont want to get into and the enernex report says you could have five to seven i think jobs per million spent and, construction job is what the title says and its just that kind of huh that kind of conversation that i am referring to. I want to make sure there werent substantive concerns that you perhaps didnt present today. No. There wasnt a substantive conversation. It was really just a preview of what the report covers, a preview of the comments we had at the staff level about the report. We have not had a briefing to our commissioners of the draft. We have been asked to put together a briefing of this version. Now, it sounds like mr. Fried refers to as the final version so that seems the version to have a briefing with the commissioners with and thats what were planning on doing. Were planning on collaborating with him and his staff to put together the pros and cons on the iss
Substantive conversation. It was really just a preview of what the report covers, a preview of the comments we had at the staff level about the report. We have not had a briefing to our commissioners of the draft. We have been asked to put together a briefing of this version. Now, it sounds like mr. Fried refers to as the final version so that seems the version to have a briefing with the commissioners with and thats what were planning on doing. Were planning on collaborating with him and his staff to put together the pros and cons on the issues at the staff level were expressing some concern about. I hope that is clearer. Thank you. Thank you. Commissioner crews. Okay. As every month im going to just struggled with this microphone. Thank you both for your comments on the enernex report. I think cleanpowersf is an important step forward for San Francisco really to halt the devastating effects of Climate Change and to make Renewable Energy a reality for San Francisco residents, so i do
Report never anticipated 9,000 jobs in San Francisco. So its that clarity i am looking for, and i want to thank your general counsel for putting the context on this, but were really just talking about how to get the message right because its going to be used and thats good. We want to make sure folks understand what it is that were talking about. Having observed some of the feedback that Marin Clean Energy has gotten when you talk to folks who chose not to be part of that program they chose not to be part of marins program in part of what i am hearing from people things werent made clear that it wasnt as transparent for them, and so i am sensitive to that i want to make sure that we get everything off on the right foot and move beyond the study phase so we can all understand what it is that this program offers, this concept could offer to San Francisco. Thank you. So my follow up question is these readers, those on the commission, the only concerns you raised today were to commissioner