more details of reality and saying that this was a really fascinating young woman and then click the link that took me to the transcript and i just got this really intense feeling. this is a really wild document and hearing this young woman speak in her own voice, through this transaction is just really thrilling and gripping. i was clicking through it like it was a page turner. and i wasjust clicking through it like it was a page turner. and i was just totally absorbed and taken by this document. and then i already started feeling what was the protagonist at the heart of it. what was the protagonist at the heart of it- heart of it. the dialogue of the film is based heart of it. the dialogue of the film is based entirely - heart of it. the dialogue of the film is based entirely on - heart of it. the dialogue of the film is based entirely on that l film is based entirely on that interrogation. how difficult was it to stay true to that dialogue? how did you not add to it, embellish it
look fishicide. rule breaking. fishicide. the defense attorney talks about the fact they ll be publicly humiliated for the rest of their lives. who do they have to blame for that? themselves. so the reality is their own attorney. correct. they ll be publicly humiliated and he s making that argument? well, your client put himself in that position. i hear you, brother. i keep wondering, what public. who is sitting back waiting to go, aren t you the cheating fishermen? all the other fishermen. fishermen are prone to exaggeration. it s well known. everybody knows about the fake camera angles. i thought you said everyone knows. everyone knows. are you married to a fisherman? i am but he would never cheat. he just they tell stories bigger and embellish.
we ll see what comes of it but that s the game plan and just one quick last point. on the whole thing that joyce was just addressing, about putting trump on the stand the other problem is, his lawyers told him he couldn t take the documents his lawyers told him what the presidential record act required and maintained so he can t even give a good ignorance defense. right? because his lawyers told him over and over. and i will note that he has some new lawyers who are serious litigators, hopefully some of that money if he really did raise $4 million, because he does tend to embellish, went up to them in front get paid in advance. get your money up front. joyce vance and michael steele, thank you. up next on the reidout, trump s strategy for fighting this indictment is coming into focus and it feels disturbingly familiar the reidout continues after
- enormous, vaulting ambition. and that set off some alarm somewhere in the back of your head. this is very bright guy. this is a very ambitious guy. and if you get in his way, he ll crush you. - the charges are quite extensive, what s in the indictment and what s on the public record. but if there are some additional restraints on what we say, you should understand. - quite a few of rudy s most spectacular wins were overturned on appeal. and that sometimes gets left out of the record cause rudy would always brag, you know, i won every case, every big case, et cetera. well, no, a lot of them got overturned and the justice system pushed back. and so that s the danger of that kind of absolute self-certainty. - the indictment should speak for itself. there s no need for mr. giuliani or any other prosecutor to embellish. - he wasn t getting his picture in the new york post as often as he could