counsel jack smith, who iscial c prosecuting donald trump, emphasized thiou s a press conference earlier today. unfortunately, i m not buying it. and i ll explain in a minute, but take a look. how did the fbunfortunatg plain ini, the incident in which hillary clinton instructed jake sullivan to take the marxist markings off of a document that wasn inst to be sent to her? yeah, we looked at thatru pretty closely. there was some problem with their secure fax machine, and there s an email in which she says, in substance, take the headers off of it and send it as a non-paper. we have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everyone. there are hundreds of classifiedthere was cure fax doe servers. how many people withou we havet a security clearance had access to that server? eds of assifiedi don t know thea as i sit here. less probablt servy more than t, less than ten. we have one set of laws in10 this country and they apply to everyone. 110 emails in 52 email chains
or beneath discussion. i think it s laughable. laughable, because if paying for something in your business isn t a business record then what is a business record? i think the first defense, as i said a minute ago, it is a common defense for defense lawyers representing executives, and you said it yourself, in a large company, there s a lot that goes on. people get cc d on email chains. that s not the organization we re talking about, which is why i think that particular defense is not so compelling under the circumstances. you know what sean carter, jay-z said. what s that. do you know? i do not. i m not a businessman. 8v my business. and if you are the business, you re the business, you are trump org, i think you re going to have legally a harder timeúéñ disassociatingcñ@s yourself fro your business records, man. couldn t agree more. i appreciate you coming on, because you re one of the real experts on this. we go to the experts hope you
them alone. no big deal . hillar hillary had one hundred and ten email chains with several top secret documents among them.nd and we re just supposed to sayye it s okay. and jim comey gets up and says,e you we re not going, but of other course, we re not going to prosecute in this case. then you ve got all these othe y ee of folks, a former civilian employee of the defense department. these were put together by jim garrity, spent three months in prison for bringing classified garrity,documents back to theire another one 18 months innt prison. and a ten thousand dollar fine for the crime of willfully retaining national defense information. another one got nine years inon a federal prison. o mar-a-lago, can you explain? that was the nine year nin, is why do the rules not pertain to the former president or to this president ? i will. i will answer your questionn. with a question. how do youho feew dol about thet that janene points out that this was the day before the midterms or somet
no big deal. hillary clinton had 110 email chains with several top-secret documents among them, and we re supposed to say it s okay, and jim comey gets up and says we re not going to prosecute in this case. other folks, a former civilian employee of the defense department, put together by jim garrity, spent months in prison for bringing classified documents back to their house. another, 18 months in prison, $10,000 crime, for willfully detaining national defense information. another one got nine years in a federal prison. geraldo, can you nine years is an espionage. why do the rules not pertain to the president or the former president? i ll answer your question with a question. how do you feel about the fact, as jeanine points out, this was the day before the midterms, something like that, the purported proximity makes it so relevant and so forth?
the probe into all things trump open in perpetuity. the country, a lot of importantl problems to deal with inflation, high gas price s ,open borders, et cetera, and crime. is this equal justicrders, ee? l now, we rel going to get back to that special prosecutor in a minute. but first,prosec in let s be c. this is not normal for. reference. let s look at three other highle cas profile cases that were handled so much differently becausetheye the democrats now it s a fact hillary clinton, she did mishandle a mountain of classified evidencfe on her and that s when she was with the state departmenthatt emails that were recovered. one hundred and ten of theme contained classified information, eight email chains containing top secreinformatt ml . anot secret informationhe. other ei another eight containid confidential material. and then, of course, wentiale thirty three thousand other emails that, well, nobody ever oteverd because they were deletn with something nobody had everob heard of ca