yale or at a certain type of party in s high school. that s the issue. we re at the case that if the white house were to deliver a list of witnesses and say only these people and no one else, what would be your reaction? i d be concerned that that was an attempt to really sharply narrow. look, if takes list of 75 witnesses, i d say okay, in a week that is a lot, but if takes list of three, that is an attempt to shut it down and not make this what is the back and forth now? i know these processes are d dynam dynamic. this is something that happens all the time. there are tons of background checks. they are used to going to senators on relevance committees and having a back and forth about what the senators want to see investigated. and i do think it is appropriate for us to offer input on what we think should or shouldn t be in the scope of this investigation. and they will take it as they do take visitor input from senators with typical investigations on
the political geographic center has shifted up to your home state in wisconsin. look at wisconsin, and pennsylvania. ohio. michigan. those are the states that elected donald trump, but wisconsin in particular seems to be searching for its political identity. will it continue to be a left of center state? or is it moving hard right? what are we going to see today in those primaries in your home state? i mean, scott walker is on the ballot, radioactive since he fwh won in 2010. a bunch of democrats vying to take him on a poll showing he is beatable in a gubernatorial race. in all likelihood, end up with a guy, a superintendent a long time on the education side. if you remember, walker went after teachers. went after their pensions, the amount of money wisconsin is putting into schools. again, this is sort of a little microcosm of trump s dynam
him continue. that slow steady climb into the lane that jeffrey would agree is say race broken down in anti-establishment and establishment. i ve got to tell you, it s increasingly confusing to me. i get why you re trying to draw distinction unless field, jeffrey. but begala, i was wrong, you were right. just another example of this dynam dynamic. first time for anything. if you catalog all might have wrong predictions, chris, you d need like a two-hour segment. oh, thank you for being a bigger man, that shocked me. let me ask you this, last night, when you heard marco rubio using tone the way he did to disarm the jeb bush attack, using the connection to his own mother and her interest about his policy. seeing his acumen on the issues,
years, and i don t think they re show votes, with all due respect to my colleague. i don t think there were show votes saying you cannot use chemical weapons isn t a show vote. saying that seeking to get u.n. inspectors is not a show vote. the russians for two years have stopped and yet they supposedly agreed to geneva too, but they haven t moved towards geneva 2. for so long as they believe assad can stay in power, think even though he s a brutal killer of his people. so the only reason that the russians are now engaged is for two reasons. number one, they saw the possibility of these strikes as degrating assad in a way that they could not only deliver, but might undermine his ability to stay in power. they say and that s not in our interests, we have to change our dynam
president obama and on obama s record. they ve not really thrown the spotlight on romney. opened romney up. made romney into sort of a dynam dynamic, exciting character and i think now, they re trying to find a way to juice up the ratings. because i think they re not inherently interested in mitt romney and i think if he s going to win, people have to get more interested in who he is and have to like him better. they want to have an audience that s tuned in and going to be interested. and he s not been helped by people like chris christie, who used the pronoun i 47 times and referred to mitt romney just on eight occasions in one paragraph. and even when referring to mitt romney, he was talking about how he s the great truth teller. he wasn t talking really about mitt romney. he was talking about his own image and brand of himself. i think to michael s point, they have to find a way to create that electric atmosphere if the