You can see kind of a mixed bag. Didnt give me italy or spain, normally i get italy or spain when im on the desk here. Theres germany, france and the ftse of course which is the only one in the green. Tenyear note yield, there it is. 1. 738 is where we stand. Crude of course had the nice move and helped some of those oil related Energy Related companies of late. Lets call it down a little bit as you see but still above 50. Our road map this morning starts with microsoft shares. They are set to hit an alltime high after strong earnings on a quarter that was boosted by what they are doing in the cloud. Were going to dig into a report with jim. Shares of tobacco maker reynolds soaring on news that British American tobacco offering to buy what it doesnt already own in the company for about 47 billion. Ive got a lot of details on this one. Youll want to stay tuned. Well share them with you. And shares of mcdonalds moving higher. Well break down the quarter and talk about what it means for s
Mr. Sanchez, may i ask you a favor before you speak can you move the ada mic. Down a little. Thank you, good evening, scott sanchez, Planning Department, so in the case of this permit, i believe that the Planning Department did correctly approve the permit, there are no bbns on file based on pelter history sand born map ask the three hour report says this is a Single Family dwelling this would normally not allow a second unit, but they may be able to legalize the unit through that process. In regards to some of the permit history based on our records, the permit holder purchased the propertied in march of 2004 and in april of 2004, the permit was sought to add one bedroom, one play room, two full bathrooms, one storage and laundry area on the existing ground floor that permit was completed in november of 2004 and then it sounds based on the Property Owners aid mission, the illegal unit was added after the final inspection on that permit. Thats all we have to say. Im available for any q
Process. In regards to some of the permit history based on our records, the permit holder purchased the propertied in march of 2004 and in april of 2004, the permit was sought to add one bedroom, one play room, two full bathrooms, one storage and laundry area on the existing ground floor that permit was completed in november of 2004 and then it sounds based on the Property Owners aid mission, the illegal unit was added after the final inspection on that permit. Thats all we have to say. Im available for any questions. Mr. Sanchez, so do you have copies of the permit or the floor plan for the rooms down . I do not have the plan ins front of me from that 2004 permit. I dont know if the billing inspection does or if the permit holder may have it. I have a copy. So, it sounds like the permit holders contract has that, but my assumption is that complies with the looms matrix with accessory ground floor rooms. Although this is similar to the prior case we heard it is different in the fact th
Situation and a brand new newborn, i can see the stress thats occurring to him, so we all just want to move on with our lives, im going the move out because i understand he wants to be with his family. I do have my parents here, one of them is disabled my brother is disabled my nephew, his sons child care is 10 minutes away from where i currently live its just a family situation were trying to do were not trying to capitalize on the market or try to make any money from this, we want to return our home back to a Single Family home. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. Sanchez, may i ask you a favor before you speak can you move the ada mic. Down a little. Thank you, good evening, scott sanchez, Planning Department, so in the case of this permit, i believe that the Planning Department did correctly approve the permit, there are no bbns on file based on pelter history sand born map ask the three hour report says this is a Single Family dwelling this would normally not allow a second unit, but they m
Two full bathrooms, one storage and laundry area on the existing ground floor that permit was completed in november of 2004 and then it sounds based on the Property Owners aid mission, the illegal unit was added after the final inspection on that permit. Thats all we have to say. Im available for any questions. Mr. Sanchez, so do you have copies of the permit or the floor plan for the rooms down . I do not have the plan ins front of me from that 2004 permit. I dont know if the billing inspection does or if the permit holder may have it. I have a copy. So, it sounds like the permit holders contract has that, but my assumption is that complies with the looms matrix with accessory ground floor rooms. Although this is similar to the prior case we heard it is different in the fact that there are legal permitted, permitted rooms down, so the only thing that would be no. Permitted or nonwarranted would be the kitchen area, correct . That would be correct, thats my understanding, i dont know i