of one of his ministers. of one of his ministers. there are no penalties of one of his ministers. there are no penalties for of one of his ministers. there are no penalties for innocent - of one of his ministers. there are no penalties for innocent errors l of one of his ministers. there are| no penalties for innocent errors in your tax affairs. find no penalties for innocent errors in your tax affairs. your tax affairs. and a sense that nothin: is your tax affairs. and a sense that nothing is working your tax affairs. and a sense that nothing is working has your tax affairs. and a sense that nothing is working has even - your tax affairs. and a sense that i nothing is working has even spread to rock superstars. i nothing is working has even spread to rock superstars. to rock superstars. i personally have been to rock superstars. i personally have been touring to rock superstars. i personally have been touring for - to rock superstars. i personally have been t
social military commission, but what have you made of all of this, the minister trying to hang on despite all the brouhaha? minister trying to hang on despite all the brouhaha? well, in politics and sometimes all the brouhaha? well, in politics and sometimes they all the brouhaha? well, in politics and sometimes they hang - all the brouhaha? well, in politics and sometimes they hang on - all the brouhaha? well, in politics and sometimes they hang on and | all the brouhaha? well, in politics - and sometimes they hang on and they are fine, and sometimes they can t. if he has broken the ministerial code, then obviously he needs to go so that sounds to be like the right decision. we so that sounds to be like the right decision. ~ ., so that sounds to be like the right decision. ~ . ., , , decision. we will hear in a couple of seconds decision. we will hear in a couple of seconds from decision. we will hear in a couple of seconds from michael - decision. we will hear in a couple o
frustrating. these trials should have been public all along, but that now that they are going to be public doesn t mean this is can turn into a show trial. i point out that, one, president clinton s counsel was allowed to be present, was allowed to question people back during the clinton proceedings and actually was allowed to call 15 witnesses to the stand and actually to ask questions. so i don t think, we still are not seeing the minority rights that we should, and we still aren t seeing the president get the representation that he should have. and the media and the democrats keep going, you know, they want to talk substance, substance, substance and not process, but process matters here, due process matters. this is about the constitution. and this is eric: isn t that the, excuse me for interrupting, but isn t that a the substance of the allegations that the democrats have against the president, saying that he broke the law in he, of course, saying that it s not true, or there
that is exactly right. the evidence wasn t there. they kept changing the story. including dr. ford as well. now you say i believe in due process, i believe in the right for people to face the accuser. but that is not what the democrats believe. now in order to protect their own they are changing their story. look, i have a lot of problems with this case as well. one being that the people that are accusing fairfax don t want to go through the criminal justice process. they don t want a real investigation. especially since that is concerning, especially since the statue of limitations has not even ended in this case. that s because we have been con sus tent on this consistent on this. tammy, i want to bring you in here. if your principles are due process matters, accusations are not elfed. evidence is evidence. if everybody is given their chance, eventually this will work its out.
that is exactly right. the evidence wasn t there. they kept changing the story. including dr. ford as well. now you say i believe in due process, i believe in the right for people to face the accuser. but that is not what the democrats believe. now in order to protect their own they are changing their story. look, i have a lot of problems with this case as well. one being that the people that are accusing fairfax don t want to go through the criminal justice process. they don t want a real investigation. especially since that is concerning, especially since the statue of limitations has not even ended in this case. that s because we have been con sus tent on this consistent on this. tammy, i want to bring you in here. if your principles are due process matters, accusations are not elfed. evidence is evidence. if everybody is given their chance, eventually this will work its out.