what have you in the old days, we had duals in this country. maybe we had improvement? we did. you had political papers that were owned by individuals who had political access to grind in the 19th century. this is a reassertion of a philosophy guiding political media back in the olden days. we re back there again when you have an unregulated media environment, which is a good thing. i agree with that. when you look at the class welfare, race card, child card, grandma card, trying to put different age groups or individuals against one another and that keeps the message that is trying to be delivered to americans, especially from my perspective, conservative as i mentioned, personal responsibility, smaller government, less spending, when you bring in the other aspects of the arguments i just mentioned, that shuts down the debate and that s all you really see and hear with the headline. let me go to know well because you worked with
in the old days, we had duals in this country. maybe we had improvement? we did. you had political papers that were owned by individuals who had political access to grind in the 19th century. this is a reassertion of a philosophy guiding political media back in the olden days. we re back there again when you have an unregulated media environment, which is a good thing. i agree with that. when you look at the class welfare, race card, child card, grandma card, trying to put different age groups or individuals against one another and that keeps the message that is trying to be delivered to americans, especially from my perspective, conservative as i mentioned, personal responsibility, smaller government, less spending, when you bring in the other aspects of the arguments i just mentioned, that shuts down the debate and that s all you really see and hear with the headline. let me go to know well because you worked with campaigns. we know what the election is
what have you in the old days, we had duals in this country. maybe we had improvement? we did. you had political papers that were owned by individuals who had political access to grind in the 19th century. this is a reassertion of a philosophy guiding political media back in the olden days. we re back there again when you have an unregulated media environment, which is a good thing. i agree with that. when you look at the class welfare, race card, child card, grandma card, trying to put different age groups or individuals against one another and that keeps the message that is trying to be delivered to americans, especially from my perspective, conservative as i mentioned, personal responsibility, smaller government, less spending, when you bring in the other aspects of the arguments i just mentioned, that shuts down the debate and that s all you really see and hear with the headline. let me go to know well because you worked with
apology or not, the issue was the treatment afforded to your colleague, who is the ranking member on your committee and a representative of the people like you are. it s a cliche and keeps reaching new lows. from you lie to the january brewer finger pointing in the face of the president to ted nugent calling the president a subhuman monogral to protesters that showed up at anti-obama rallies packing assault rifles. courseness, rudeness is hardly new to politics. president clinton s detractors called him a murderer. we had members of congress kill each other in duals. there s a point where this is about more than bad manners. chairman issa is accused by democrats of using his office to have witch hunts and turned up
where you re deciding to run tv ads and what messages you re deciding to run. colin, why do you say that when doing this that the campaigns need to target on influencers? how are they able to determine who they are? well, you re one of them. ab who they are? well, you re one of them. the people that have a following online. it s been one of the really interesting developments the last 10 or 15 years is all these independent voices from bloggers to radio hosts to tv hosts to reporters to local activists who might just have a big twitter following. all of these people can in some way influence the political discussion. in 2012 we saw david axelrod with the obama campaign and his republican equivalent having twitter duals. those weren t aimed at the general public, they were aimed at people like you, reporters. i m not going to read you some of the tweets i ve gotten, people get nasty on monday. great to have you on. thank you, sir. thank you very much. absolutely. today marks