his incriminating phone calls with fox news. so the notion these people haven t been heard from at all doesn t wash because they ve been heard from in public, they just won t go under ooet. the people who have gone under oath have largery corroborated the accounts. to broad it out again, it s not just call records. what this report does as 300 plus pages is say to the white house, we see your defiance and your bluffs. here s the actual story. do you care to respond? we have judiciary hearings coming up. seems like they don t care to respond though. thus far, not in a setting that puts pressure on them so there s a lot of bluff and bluster ant tweets. but i think the question is it because having to go sit under oath and make these arguments on twitter, on fox news, to individual reporters, a lot easier to do it there. there are a lot less consequences doing it there than they would have if they sat under oath in front of a
white house. so the court of law argument doesn t wash here. and my issue here is hearing all these people, all of whom are honest people who are telling the truth and gordon sondland does have his issues and you don t need gordon sondland to make this point, mick mull vaughny said the president of the united states said withhold the aid. nobody said it. why not let the people who are with the president every day unless you re trying to hide what they have to say. you have executive privilege that go beyond this presidency. presidents need to be able to communicate with their counselors and have the confidence that the rest of the world will not hear about those conversations they ve had about policy decisions that they make inside the white house. it s longstading precedence and longstanding constitutional precedence and it s alive, well and real and it goes well beyond this president. you have nine people all coming out saying the president
none of which is true. harris: how he comes out and denies everything. chris: so schiff made it worse. if he thought that clintonian we is in the front and that doesn t count, that harris: meaning we, not me. chris: the royal we. [laughter] it doesn t wash. through all of this stuff, it s been a little too cutesy. he ought to tend to his knitting. harris: do you think nancy pelosi is telling him that? jessica: to push back on your perspective of adam schiff wanting the limelight and being in a position they don t want to be in, when we got the readout or the memorandum of the call, which had invented the phrase even though kevin mccarthy doesn t remember do me a favor, though, and the testimony from kurt volker, there is ample evidence of what democrats are alleging, which is
or latinos in general, that doesn t wash if you don t give me the economic boom you promised me and i m suffering, them are not the ones i voted for, you are mr. trump. how do you in light of what sara is saying, if you re donald trump how do you defend hat. it s only so long you can blame the other and playing bigotry when somebody is saying wait a minute i m having a problem making ends meet in my household and you promised me better. i would like to think no motor than a quarter of the country would continue to espouse that bigotry further the president s bigotry, attend the rallies, fan those flames. if they are really being hurt financially, you know there s a hard core racist support for this president that may never vanish. doesn t matter the economic reality. but, you know, at the end of the
epstein has been charged with. not to take away anything from the me too movement, but you re talking about child rape and pedophilia. you can t suggest that, oh, ten years ago things were entirely different. they weren t. the one question i do have is whether or not the president s affiliation with epstein will help or hurt acosta. even if you believe his rationale and things have changed, why did you conduct it all in secret? why did you leave your office and travel miles away to a secret meeting with the lawyer of jeffrey epstein? why did not never tell the victims? that s illegal. his rationale doesn t wash. and just quickly, you never heard an i m sorry there, correct? no. i thought that if i were advising alex acosta, i would tell him to look at the pete buttigieg answer on the shootings. someone able to own up to a mistake. these women, these dozens of children were let down by the state system and the federal