rights legally to put this vaccination requirement in place? what does the law say here? i do. the law says osha must must do it if there s grave workplace dangers. the majority said, well, the dangers here are workplace and everywhere. the dissent said so what, there are workplace dangers, and they re accentuated in the workplace. that s enough, and i think they were right. the liberal dissent says this decision undercuts the capacity of the responsible federal officials acting well within the scope of their authority to protect american workers from grave danger. why didn t that argument win, harry? that s the broader theme, right? having administrative agencies with expertise and uniformity, it didn t win because the new majority doesn t like the administrative state very much, doesn t trust it and wants to scale it back. i want to see if you understand this, all right, because these are comments from
tucker: this is a fox news alert. war in ukraine underway right now. reports that ukrainian president zelensky refuses to leave the capital city. russian troops within miles of it. this is a freedom reporter from australia and doesn t trust the media coverage of ukraine so he went there. thanks for coming on. what is happening? it s unbelievable. yesterday morning when it started, we were from walking down the street. not knowing what was happening and seeing cruise missiles.
the future that secured the sticky secure the future of the country. that secured the sticky secure the future of the country.- that secured the sticky secure the future of the country. does that underline why the future of the country. does that underline why there the future of the country. does that underline why there is the future of the country. does that underline why there is so the future of the country. does that underline why there is so much - underline why there is so much pessimism about the talks tomorrow? in the first five minutes of our programme, we have laid bare the problems. lessee had doesn t trust the russians, colonel vindman says and negotiation isn t facilitated because the russians have met their objectives and the ukrainian still think they can push them back, and there really is no outside actor who can provide assurances ukraine once. we know very little about the state of this we know very little about the state of this particular port
hopes that this information gives off full understanding of russia strategic blunder. the president was asked about the dangers of putin being left in the dark by his own advisors. mr. president, what is the danger of putin being left in the dark by his military advisors? can you comment on the declassified intelligence that he doesn t trust, since it declassified? no. the white house did say it has information of how putin feels misled by the russian military which has resulted in persistent tensions between putin and his military. shannon? shannon: matt finn, thank you very much. interesting new numbers regarding menus on the leaders in russia s war on ukraine. meanwhile president biden speaking to president zelenskyy promising $500 million in new funding. white house correspondent
people are going to feel the consequences. there s sort of an if this than that. and if that is the case, then em base the fact that 46% of the country doesn t trust your institution, but they want it both ways. i think six. six of the justices have made comments about this being political. you take justice kavanagh s comments, i don t have a legal analysis of this, but the political analysis of saying who are we to decide, we should send this back to legislatures, the court deals with all sorts of rights without sending it back to the states. yeah. clearly on this issue, the court is out of step with the american people and they know they re out of step with the american people and they can t acknowledge that, but this is the very conservative supreme court that