now you want me to tucker: you don t want to answer real questions? i want to answer the real questions you asked me to come on. tucker: so i m being unfair?r, in my races come too? no, you re just being tucker: committed to adult conversation? i came on here to talk about the census and instead you want to talk about state government issues. tucker: oh, it s a trick. so let me ask you a census question. why shouldn t we know, why shouldn t we be allowed to know citizens and noncitizens live here? do you want to use political polarization to bias the census? if so, then we should have a question about guns. why shouldn t we know how many guns are in each household? these reason we don t ask that s because we don t want to politically biased the sentence. tucker: why do we ask raise questions? why do we do the german race thing? why do we ask that?
people, these are people with skin in theeo game, and a severl were currently unfolding. look, i am not here to defend i hardly have to say this with a rational person, the regime of assad. by what i? i m an american. my interest is only and that is why actors like you and on many other channels and all over the left, you are hearing people say what you said, which is, it s unpatriotic or in fact, treasonous to ask these questions. i am just saying, how do you account for the fact that thedo secretary of state is saying the same thing i said on monday? do you think he s just loyal? it s a real question based on the columns he s written. you are mischaracterizing his remarks. he is not putting into question this. if you do want to get into why it is necessary to respond to these attacks, then we should talk about that because i agree that the american public has not been informed by the political class as to what american
secretary of defense has the same questions. whether you know it or not, you are advancing pro assad narratives. check out the kremlin funding networks due to the favorable coverage you are receiving. tucker: that s irrelevant to the question. let s answer the question. tucker: i don t seek that coverage for the secretary of defense has been asked twice directly on this and in either case, in either case, he said he knows about them. this is not an ancillary question. the comments he made it very clear that he is not questioning the outcome up investigations like that, or the united nations joint investigative mechanism, which went so far to say, that said that syria was responsible for it. these are investigations that were conducted and were very thorough. tucker: again, i don t want to be mean to you. i know you here is part of the key when day with of defense
be very careful and very cautious about public opinion. a poll in britain shows only one and four britain s support military action and i bite in america it s not a majority either. tucker: if you don t believe in democracy, it doesn t matter.sn last question quickly, do you purposes of the where would be to divert attention from the fact that you are not taking care of your own people? you re elected to look after your own people. when you don t, may be having a war is a way to change the conversation? yes, it is. it s also a great deflection away from all sorts of social issues, which really give all of our problems the first role of government is to protect and maintain thefov interests of the citizens. however horrible things in syria are, they do not affect directly american interests or british interests, either, and i hope our leaders think again. tucker: i hope so too. nigel farage, thank you for that clear explanation. the hunt for russian collusion has become somethin
previous gas attack. he is asked, is there credible evidence about sarin gas and chlorine. no, i have not gotot that evidence. i don t have the evidence. what i m saying is that other groups on the ground, ngos, fighters, have said crn has been used.sa we are looking for evidence. i don t have evidence, credible or uncredible. that was the response from the actual exchange. i don t know did you see an agent of putin, too? he s saying we don t have assets on the ground and mustard syria. those who have been on the ground and mustard syria, the cw, the united nations, have established rather definitively that this 2017 attack was a sarin attack. this most recent attack tucker: stop. nobody is contesting the nature of the attack. that is immaterial. we can determine what the chemical was. the question is who launched it. because that is the question on which our action turns.