congress are. there are very similar kinds of problems. we have seen statistics showing that there were hundreds, and hundreds of cases in which federal judges did not recuse themselves from the case, even though they own stocks that would be affected by the ruling. so i think the problem is there with both members of congress, and with judges, and we ought to deal with both of them at one time. i want to ask the broader question, because we just got this post office bill that we saw, the past 341 votes. i know you are a big post office advocate, i think that you and i have spoken about it before, what is the grand unified theory for when bipartisanship works, or does not work in the house? because, it is interesting to me, there are certain things where you just know you are not going to get a single republican vote, and there are other places where that is not the case, and sometimes i am a little surprised by what it does and doesn t fall into which category. well i think that t
$35 on our plan. $35 a month. the companies are still going to make a healthy profit. we can do that tomorrow with the stroke of a pen. we have a generation of so-called sandwiched generation. that is you have a young child and an elderly parent and they both need help. look, we can help them take care of mom and dad and make it work. there s a program that allows us to on medicare. that someone can come and install a handrail in the shower so mom doesn t fall. to make sure they have what they need to live in safety and dignity in their home, pick up the prescriptions, make an occasional meal. we can do all that. so when mom and dad put their head on the pillow at night they can have peace of mind their elderly parents are doing well and their children are okay. we re still going to work on gas prices. we re still going to work on the food prices, but in the
would be affected by the ruling. so i think the problem is there with both members of congress, and with judges, and we ought to deal with both of them at one time. i want to ask the broader question, because we just got this post office bill that we saw, the past 341 votes. i know you are a big post office advocate, i think that you and i have spoken about it before, what is the grand unified theory for when bipartisanship works, or does not work in the house? because, it is interesting to me, there are certain things where you just know you are not going to get a single republican vote, and there are other places where that is not the case, and sometimes i am a little surprised by what it does and doesn t fall into which category. well i think that the reality is, when the vast majority of american people regardless of whether they are registered or vote as republicans or democrats, really care about it. congress gets it done. that is what we
private computer data to create evidence of a donald trump-russia connection. clinton tweeted the story is, quote, nonsense. but republicans say there is plenty to talk about. i think the republicans are looking to investigate this when we get power again if we get power again in 2023. today lawyers for michael sussmann, a former clinton campaign associate, filed a motion to dismiss durham s indictment which charges sussmann with lying to the fbi when failing to disclose his ties to the clinton campaign. sussmann s attorney accuse durham of, quote, extraordinary prosecutorial overreach. sussmann s request likely won t work. it s a common application to make pre-trial, john. buff it s one of these issues that s got to be resolved by a jury. did he make a false statement or not? while sussmann s lawyers and clinton herself argue the probe is all about politics. republicans believe the investigation is long overdue. they want durham to be guaranteed more time and resources to inve
bret. the way he looks at it when you look at the warsaw pack, which totally evaporated his last resort of having some type of buffer happens to be ukraine. he looks at it that way. unfortunately we are looking at it differently. we are actually talking past each other. we are looking at potentially ukraine being part of nato. and he has said repeatedly that s a red line that he does not want them to cross. and the longer we keep talking about ukraine being part of nato, it s actually a burr under a saddle. and we have made it a nato issue. it s not a nato issue today because ukraine is not part of nato so it doesn t fall under article 5 attack on attack on all. he looks at this. he doesn t have buffer. he believes it s similar if aanalogous to having cuba with their missiles