relationship with a ccp spy and then was servingu on the intel committee committee. it s unbelievable that thatthene happened. and then we have adam schiff, how he has lied and lied to the american people and abused the american people s taxpayerxo dollars with his lies with the russia hoax. he nevers deservewithd power ot committee. and he shouldn t have been on the january 6th committee either. e anso kevin mccarthy as speakef the house is doing the right thing and removing these democrat members that deserve to be removed. elwha nomar is another example. she s anti-semitic and she should not be on foreign affairs. these aren t political things. n gs these are the right things to do. let me ask you., i knowwant the democrats desperately want to distract from t the the issue of the president and the classifiednt top secret documens now in four locations. i get that. so trying to gin up the american people on the issue of the debt ceiling. my understanding is that really won t be an
who are going to have the power of subpoena. and there are so many questions outstanding, starting with theag biden documents. for w example, the leads you right into the university of pennsylvania, which received miliof pennsa and millions of ds from the chinese communistt s. d and the whole question of how was that money accounted for to what degree did virtually the entire biden team, including the secretary of stateing thy of, earn a livif money from the university of pennsylvania? which was fungible from the chinese communist? secondpe., get you into the hunr biden situation when you find out that there sit were documens that were classified about ukraine. and you remember that hunter biden was making tons of money out of charism ma, ukrainian natural gas company in an area where he had zero, literally zero information. it was purely a payoff to have access to his father. that gets you in another. questi the third question is , how come the lawyers knew where onhow coto look?
you look at the evidence and you don t think that the president has done something wrong, perhaps there s something wrong with you. again, that doesn t mean yhe should be removed from office or impeachment. but just from the facts, from the transcript, from the phone call, from the overheard phone call, the evidence is damning. it is. but you know what i worry here is that obstruction works in the end, right? you know, the president, the white house has banned the witnesses that would then make the explicit connection between the president and this order. john bolton, secretary pompeo, all the folks who someone like sondland says were also in on this, and the documens, the emails. i mean sondland said that in his opening statement. i can t back up all of my statements because i can t go back to reference the emails, communications, text messages, et cetera, that might jog my memory. and the worrisome fact here is does the white house strategy,
staff er had had leaked documens to them. it s very confusing, but the short story is e we contacted him and e he admitted he had no such evidence. the local fox affiliate put an editor s note saying he s retracted the statements. the problem is by the time that happened, it s run wild. and it s taken on a life of its own. there s no evidence suggesting that this dnc staffer had been in contact with wikilea wikileaks. there s zero evidence. what newt gingrich is saying is not true. maybe he has been misled. he didn t respond to our comments this morning. but it s very bizarre. what about this man s family? what are they saying? the spokesperson for the