holding up this photo you showea moment ago on cnn and saying anyone who wants to deny it s a crisis, i ll show you this phot photo. anyone like, don lemon? nancy pelosi? chuck schumer? they have all denied previously that it was a crisis. tucker: so, they are betting, i guess, that nobody else in america can remember what the world was like three months ago, or what they said three months ago? speak out right. part of it is you now have this debate in congress and house republicans bear some responsibility. remember, they ran the house the first two years of donald trump s administration. they didn t follow through on the wall, they didn t follow through on a lot of pieces. they did some of it, but there is a lot they didn t follow up on. so you have that issue on the table. now, byron york was pointing this out today. you have democrats and republicans in congress fighting about few billion dollars to the with the border crisis. everyone should admit it is a
holding up this photo you showed a moment ago on cnn and saying anyone who wants to deny it s a crisis, i ll show you this photo. anyone like, don lemon? or nancy pelosi? chuck schumer? they have all denied previously that it was a crisis. tucker: so, they are betting, i guess, that nobodyy else in america can remember what the world was like three months ago, or what they said three months ago? right. part of it is you now have this debate in congress and house republicans bear some responsibility. remember, they ran the house the first two years of donald trump s administration. they didn t follow through on the wall, they didn t follow through on a lot of pieces. they did some of it, but there is a lot they didn t follow up on. so you have that issue on the table. now, byron york was pointing this out today.n you have democrats and republicans in congress fighting about a few billion dollars to deal with the border crisis. everyone should admit it is a crisis as the president fi
a, these contacts began earlier than we realized, the court filing on friday cites at least one in november of 2015, which again very much changes the timeline, because then by that point it changes the way we think about subsequent contacts and things that we thought might have been an initial approach might have actually been follow-up approaches. the second thing, as you said, they just didn t turn any of this help down. in fact, the counter point to that is striking in and of itself, which is on friday we saw sort of the one contact that we know of that michael cohen didn t follow-up on was an offer of help that was offering political s political synergy from the kremlin, and he didn t follow-up on that because he thought he
mind, don s. that you could have this information out there, that e-mail was available to the republican members of the house intel committee and they chose not to pursue that lead and instead decided to say nothing to see here, folks. we are not going to follow up on bannon or flynn or hold them in contempt. we just don t see a problem. how can that be? why are you shaking your head? that s exactly what the democrats are saying today in their dissent. they disagree with the republicans. they believe that the republicans moved quickly to please the president. it s quite clear that s how they feel and the democrats, they listed a whole bunch of things that the republicans didn t do. didn t follow up on. they didn t follow up on key issues. failed to issue subpoenas. the dems have made an issue and we know special council has been looking into some of the trump campaign business associates, some of trump s business dealings, previous business d l dealings before he was president.
chemical weapons to syria, complicating that crisis even more. john bolton is the former u.s. ambassador to the u.n. he used to have nikki haley s job. also a fox news contributor. good evening, ambassador. glad to be with you. ed: talk to me a little bit. we ve heard about the chemical weapons in syria. barack obama asked drew now infamous redline that he didn t follow up on. now you see this administration pressuring north korea, but having to worry again about syria and how their chemical weapons may complicate the situation with north korea. please explain. i think it all fits together. barack obama relied on representations by russia that it would insist that syria destroy its existing stocks of chemical weapons and basically forgo any further use. and yet at the same time u.n. weapons inspectors found that north korea was selling in the past couple of years, selling syria significant quantities of