And Transportation Committee of the San Francisco board of supervisors. Im supervisor mariana melgar, chair of the committee. Joined by vice chair dean preston, the Committee Clerk today is john carroll, and i would also like to acknowledge Jeanette Engel from safeguard tv, mr. Clark, do you have any announcements . Yes. Thank you. Please ensure that youve silenced your cell phones and other Electronic Devices you brought with you to the chamber today. If you have Public Comment on any of todays sorry if you have Public Comment on todays singular agenda item, when your item of interest comes up and Public Comment is called, please line up to speak along the western wall of this room. You may submit your written Public Comment by emailing me at joanne period. Crowell at sf gov. Org or you may send your written Public Comment to our office in city hall. That is the clerks office, room 244. City halls address is one. Doctor Carlton B Goodlett place, San Francisco, california 94102. Items
Resource determined on sub stfrjal evidence to be a resource the public review project began on december 6, 2017, and will continue until 5 00 p. M. , january 23, 2018. The Commission Members had electronic members of draft e. I. R. And background reports, including Historic Resource evaluation and response. The Commission Secretary has also distributed a handout, which i will refer you to later. Copies of this handout are available to members of the public on the table to my left. Today were here to provide the commission to provide public testimony, to discuss and formulate any comments that you wish to submit on the draft e. I. R. I would like to provide with you a brief summary of the draft e. I. R. With Historical Resources the project site is a 2story building that housed the Metropolitan Community Church of San Francisco and is now vacant. The proposed project would demolish the building, split the lot into two and construct two fourstory, 40foottall residential buildings. Each
Draft e. I. R. Pursuant to the California Environmental quality act or ceqa and procedures for implementing ceqa. Chapter 31 requires a Planning Department to schedule public hearing that the Historic Preservation commission may have on a draft e. I. R. , and prepared for projects that contain a resource determined on sub stfrjal evidence to be a resource the public review project began on december 6, 2017, and will continue until 5 00 p. M. , january 23, 2018. The Commission Members had electronic members of draft e. I. R. And background reports, including Historic Resource evaluation and response. The Commission Secretary has also distributed a handout, which i will refer you to later. Copies of this handout are available to members of the public on the table to my left. Today were here to provide the commission to provide public testimony, to discuss and formulate any comments that you wish to submit on the draft e. I. R. I would like to provide with you a brief summary of the draft
Have five legislative days in which to submit material to the chair for inclusion in the record. This series hearing is entitled evaluating the effectiveness of us section programs and i recognize myself for a opening statement. Im pleased to welcome our colleagues and witnesses to the subcommittee hearing on us sanctions. From iran to north korea to russia and venezuela got sanctions are used as the instrument in our foreignpolicy toolkits and Congress Must ensure that they be held accountable for results. This hearing will examine major Sanction Program as we seek to evaluate their effectiveness. Let me highlight three points that may provide context. First, sanctions are key to bringing about behavioral change abroad and in this committee its designed accordingly. That means calibrating sanctions and the sanctions relief based on specific and achievable actions we wish to see from a foreign actor. Tailoring sanctions in this way is especially important for secondary sanctions given
Implementing ceqa. Chapter 31 requires a Planning Department to schedule public hearing that the Historic Preservation commission may have on a draft e. I. R. , and prepared for projects that contain a resource determined on sub stfrjal evidence to be a resource the public review project began on december 6, 2017, and will continue until 5 00 p. M. , january 23, 2018. The Commission Members had electronic members of draft e. I. R. And background reports, including Historic Resource evaluation and response. The Commission Secretary has also distributed a handout, which i will refer you to later. Copies of this handout are available to members of the public on the table to my left. Today were here to provide the commission to provide public testimony, to discuss and formulate any comments that you wish to submit on the draft e. I. R. I would like to provide with you a brief summary of the draft e. I. R. With Historical Resources the project site is a 2story building that housed the Metro