Lastly, on the unauthorized units, weve been a big champion of these. Theres an estimate of 20 to 50,000. If you knew how many you would have to remove them. They exist in the city but they are an important housing resource. Most are rent controlled. A lot of our most vulnerable renters live in these units. We have two objectives around this. One is retain as many units as we can, protect them from merger, from demolition and conversion. The other is protect tenants rights as best we can. We think we recommended both of those things. Every unit will have a broad path to legalization. So if you can feasibly legalize, you will be allowed under the planning code to legalize it. Thats the first thing. The other thing is by removing these loopholes, the areas that dont allow you to approve the merger under section 317, so thats the no fault evictions and the more than one unit, you then as a commissioner will have to approve every unit removal, every unit merger, et cetera. That gives you t
Lati. Supervisor haney and they shaped this into something that was truly connected to the actual needs within the system and on the ground, and so were confident that it can be successful, but were also very sure that theres a lot of work left to do. Its not fully funded yet. We have a commitment from the mayor, but we need at least 100 million a year, including startup costs, to be able to implement this. Its going to take a lot of work from the implementation committee, oversight and working together, potentially needed additional revenue from the public. So i know that the public is excited about this i hope they are, but theyre asking, well actually be excited the most about this when we see it bringing a change in our communities, and so thats going to be the next steps once it passes today. Im grateful for everybodys support and for everybodys leadership, and im excited about seeing this fully implemented and funded and lastly want to give, as supervisor ronen did, give a shout
Commission. Discussion around the faux saws and this is going back to 2015. The discussion of the retention related to the Historic Properties and how it had been coming out in the city and the sort of product that had been arriving through this process. In 2016, further discussion of examples. In 2017 reviewing draft policy staff had begun to develop. What was interesting was the shift in thinking from this as preservation. There is conversation if these were preservation projects. At that point the commission directed staff to begin describing this as a Design Review process rather than preservation. This is complex within the Preservation Community. Early this year we presented a new take on this which was much more around Design Review. There was a joint Commission Hearing between planning and Historic Preservation to discuss how it might work and direct projects in the future. This came out of preservation conversation and into Design Review. That is when you saw it last. We then
Or other similar sound, producing Electronic Device places you on item number four, approval of minutes for the april 2nd regular meeting. I do want to share that Herbert Weiner requested a correction to his Public Comment on page three, item seven, expressing appreciation specifically for paraTransit Service. If you feel inclined to include that correction, it would be appreciated. Thank you, directors, are there any other changes to the april 2nd minutes . Yes seeing none, well open Public Comment for anyone in the room wishing to speak on the minutes item for okay. Seeing none, we can close Public Comment. Is there a motion with mr. Weiners amendment so moved. Second, second. Thank you. Please call the roll on the motion to approve the minutes with the correction director. Hemminger a hemminger director henderson, a henderson i director hinsey i hinsey i director. So i so i director tarlov i tarlov i director. Katina i katina i can, i can i thank you the minutes are approved places
Or other similar sound, producing Electronic Device places you on item number four, approval of minutes for the april 2nd regular meeting. I do want to share that Herbert Weiner requested a correction to his Public Comment on page three, item seven, expressing appreciation specifically for paraTransit Service. If you feel inclined to include that correction, it would be appreciated. Thank you, directors, are there any other changes to the april 2nd minutes . Yes seeing none, well open Public Comment for anyone in the room wishing to speak on the minutes item for okay. Seeing none, we can close Public Comment. Is there a motion with mr. Weiners amendment so moved. Second, second. Thank you. Please call the roll on the motion to approve the minutes with the correction director. Hemminger a hemminger director henderson, a henderson i director hinsey i hinsey i director. So i so i director tarlov i tarlov i director. Katina i katina i can, i can i thank you the minutes are approved places