see tomorrow. you know, i think you re right about that. and the other important thing about the steve bannon quotes from that michael wolff book is that time period when that meeting happened, early june of 2016, steve bannon was not yet a member of the trump campaign. so any knowledge he has what did or didn t take place and of course he claimed it s hard to believe that natalia veselnitskaya wasn t escorted up to meet the candidate himself. but any knowledge he has would be secondhand works be after the fact. he wouldn t have been a key participant to those meetings. so i think what we re going to what hill investigators or i should say democratic investigators will want to find out is does steve bannon actually have some reason to believe that the candidate himself was informed than meeting? if he didn t meet with them, was he informed about it afterwards? or was that just kind of of denigrating some of his rivals inside the trump orbit. i think you put it well. dennis ackerm
actually have some reason to believe that the candidate himself was informed than meeting? if he didn t meet with them, was he informed about it afterwards? or was that just kind of of denigrating some of his rivals inside the trump orbit. i think you put it well. dennis ackerman, you to take this with a grain of salt. because steve bannon, as we know is verbal napalm on anyone he doesn t like. it s one of the things that earned him so many enemies across the spectrum. and so how do investigators in your view separate if they re serious, not just looking for negative information, right? they have to be looking for true fgs, evidence. how do they do that tomorrow? first of all, the elephant in the room is really michael flynn. yeah. it s a very interesting situation. because the prosecutors, mueller s office knows what bannon can say about flynn. none of those individuals on that committee have a clue about