I want you to take a listen and then we ll talk. i m also going to meet with democrats and see if i can get a health care plan that s even better. so i will negotiate with democra democrats, but from the republican standpoint, we have the votes. we ll vote in january, february, or march. a couple things here. how realistic is it that he can bring the republicans and democrats together on something so particularizing of an issue and why not do this beforehand? well, yes, why didn t we start talking about a bipartisan piece of legislation back in january, have committee hearings, bring both sides together. right. a lot of people have been especially democrats have been wondering why didn t we try and do this the old fashioned way rather than push it through with just republican support. they do not have the republican votes now despite what the president keeps saying.
Doing that, but he did admit to what he called a mild case of nausea over the thought that he could have swayed the election, but again, having no regrets. a lot of back and forth between democra democrats. republicans for their part wanted to know about the e-mail investigation. comey revealed there were several e h-mails. his investigators said they had several e-mails, some with classified information. they wanted a search warrant, they wanted to reopen the investigation. he told them to go ahead, and it was a few months after that where he once again came in front of the public and said the investigation was closed, there was nothing revealed. the chain went through hillary clinton s closest aide to her then-husband weiner saying he should print them out so people
Federal judges to nominate. what else did this process teach him? anything? i think from a political side, it was pretty obvious. you can disagree with judge gorsuch s judicial philosophy, but i think by every standard, he was a very highly qualified justice. the american bar association rated him their highest people who have worked for them in the past. his judicial record in terms of the number of cases where he was in the mainstream and democratic appointees sided with him. i think it showed the president trying to work with senate democra democrats was somewhat of a feudal task. they made up their mind rega regardless of who the person was they were going to vote it down. so that was the biggest lesson. it also shows when you have the right individual, you have
For donald trump to democra democrats. it s time if for lindsey graham to reach out to democrats. what do democrats need to find in this replacement of obamacare and what exactly into the rogue gop members that did not vote for it, what exactly are they looking for that would make them happy? what does everyone want to make this come together? because we re not going to get a solution to this if both the parties do not work together. and i don t think that donald trump has failed as a negotiator in this whole movement. i think that what is happening is we re finding out that this is such a bigger problem that we all have to this is beyond politics. we have to work together on this. so what do democrats want? that s the question. look, i think democrats passed wom caobamacare in 2009. it s been 2010 signed into
Democra democrats have to be careful overplaying their hands with this and what this investigation might turn out to be. white house in precarious position, basically saying they ve never heard of paul manafort, mike flynn a volunteer. paul who? just a gentleman who worked for them for five or six months. they re in a difficult position. then all of this back and forth between nunes and schiff leading to the question of whether or not any of these investigations will be credible to the public. point is watching chairman nunes yesterday. went over to the white house, then gave two press conferences instead of going to his own committee. then he said giving the president cover for his claims but there s no prove. there s no cover for those claims. what i found most surprising out of what devin nunes said