They may conclude that, well, if there are some outer perimeter crimes the president commits, maybe he should have immunity for that and the only way we will know, whether any of what Donald Trump did, should enjoy outer perimeter immunity, is to send it back to the judge, to hold all kinds of evidentiary hearings on whether some of what he did might enjoy some outer perimeter protection. Then, it can come back to the Supreme Court and then we can definitively resolve the case. The reason i am concerned is that it will eat up so much time. Donald trump may not be tried and tell 2026. Speaking of eating up time, i have to have you come back, because this idea of outer perimeter immunity demands its own segment. It defies logic to just leave it here, but thank you both very much for coming back to the sunday show
Defiant-donald-trump
President
Way
Immunity
Perimeter
Crimes
Commits
Merchan
Supreme-court
Protection
Hearings
Kinds
Evidence and applies the instructions of law, as Judge Merchan gives it to them, i am fairly confident they may end up convicting Donald Trump and may do it in a New York minute. Jurors have already had to worry about their identities being leaked, a couple jurors have been asked to be removed, might we see other jurors ask to be dismissed . I feel like its almost inevitable that we will have other Jury Bumps along the way. Its not that unusual, when we pick a jury, was in the Jurors Home for the night, they come back the next day to begin hearing opening statements. One or more of the jurors are like, you know what, i came up with some reason, some concerns, and i might not be able to sit and that happens all the time. You know, early on in the process, the judge, if those reasons are valid, can dismiss that juror and replace that juror with an alternate. Because there are only six alternate seated, if we have an
Defiant-donald-trump
Jurors
Merchan
Evidence
It
Law
New-york
Instructions
Way
Identities
Jury-bumps
Jury
Are all watching these cases get stuck in the lower courts, and not go to trial. This is the first to go forward and theres been temptation to say this doesnt matter, its not a big deal, but the fact that it is fundamentally about honest elections and whether or not trump can break all the rules that apply to everyone else, i think that matters and it really raises the stakes. I was convinced that this was the right time to bring these charges and that they were the right charges, because the District Attorney showed that if trump is found guilty, that he truly did conspire to violate state and federal election laws and is a serious offense and he should be held accountable. Glenn, you are the formal federal prosecutor. The former federal prosecutor. Are you skeptical of this case . No, not really. When you see the evidence, okay, i understand, but when you see the mountain of evidence amassed against donald trump, when the folks who are suspicious of the sort of
Cases
Fact
Courts
First
Deal
Temptation
Doesn-t-matter
Trump
Manhattan-district-attorney
Rules
Everyone
Charges
Quality of the evidence in this case go to things like, oh, Michael Cullen was lying, okay, of course he was. In fact, that was to protect Donald Trump and keep him out of hot water. Its not the question of whether a witness lied, previously, that will convince the jury about the Strength Or Weakness of the case, its whether that witness is telling the truth now and whether the witness is corroborated. With things like Covert Audio Recordings of Donald Trump and Michael Cullen, conspiring to commit the crime, with hard evidence like, you know, documents and reimbursement checks that Donald Trump was writing, including out of the oval office, you take the weakness of Michael Cohen lying and turn it into a strength. You talk about his motive for lying, which was to help his former boss. I am not all that concerned that if the jury follows the
Defiant-donald-trump
Case
Things
Evidence
Course
Fact
Lying
Quality
Water
Michael-cullen
Jury
Question
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.