The Kerala High Court recently addressed the question as to the mode in which an accused ought to request the Court for adducing the defence evidence. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, perused Section 233.
what was your feeling aboutsp their responses? haveica s top military leaders have brought misery to almosty a every partlm the globe they have touched. they put iran in a position of power in iraq. they armed isis in syria. over afgha they turned over afghanistansib, to the taliban in the bloodiestu way possible. we could have takeldken oun outt the suicide bomber didn ty didn give the authorities. they didn t even get thert right vengeance part right. tucker, when . k that e when they were supposed to take out isis, they took outi went a family on the way to a barbecueecue. and so now you see them trying to bring the misery and the our ruin home to our country country through this embrace of diversity, equity and inclusion . and this is real money. seventy million they ve requested for enhancements to diversity, equity and inclusion. this is the most divisive stuffe possible. and when i showed the secretarsh of defense evidence thate it ws happening in nevada, in montana, ihappenn
accept the state s take on the neighbor as a harmless eccentric. the most compelling evidence as to how this occurred involved the neighbor, mr. tate. he was mentally ill. i m done talking to you. and, according to the defense, dangerous, too. the defense then hammered home the portrayal of the unpredictable neighbor by using todd s own complaint summary from that day. you re in the awkward situation of being their best witness. right. you believed he could become a danger. anyone who should respond to that residence again should use extreme caution. that is correct, i did. the defense theorized that tate entered the trailer through an unlocked door and shot lisa for revenge. the key defense evidence that suggested an intruder was a stray peanut butter-and-jelly sandwich, in a baggie, left on the back deck. there was a sandwich that would not have been there the night before that was there. critters should have
should be included, as well. what is this, a trial or a grand jury? you indict based upon evidence, you go forward. don t talk to me about defense evidence. and finally, what about this who senator chuck grassley talked about suppressing evidence, the whistle-blowers came out and said they ended that investigation. so you have all kinds of other charges. the timing is very unusual. is anyone going to look at the paintings, whether or not that was a problem? that is something that should be looked into. there s a lot more to this than just a tax charge and a line on an application. dana: you mentioned tony bobulinski, he was on tucker s show this week, talking what his interactions, let s look at tha. would you speak to the fbi again? i would be happy to. at any time? not just the fbi, the u.s.
Martha MacCallum brings the story of the times with her tough but fair interviews and straightforward analysis; The Story captures the voices that need to be.