tate entered the trailer through an unlocked door and shot lisa for revenge. the key defense evidence that suggested an intruder was a stray peanut butter-and-jelly sandwich, in a baggie, left on the back deck. there was a sandwich that would not have been there the night before that was there. critters should have devoured it, he argued. he told the jury it must have been the killer s snack. i believe it to be the most compelling piece of evidence in the whole case. it was now up to a jury to decide. but it wouldn t be easy. coming up in the jury room deliberations and drama. he started pounding on the door, saying he wanted out of there, and we were in tears. when dateline continues. with nucala. nucala is a once-monthly add-on treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma that can mean less oral steroids.
that is a movement he has to prove. if she says, your honor, you can dismiss this now because it didn t meet the burden, then she doesn t have to put on any of that defense evidence. but if the judge is in doubt, then she will have to put these witnesses on, and i think that will robot anything any of the claims that are being made in defense of his getting this trial removed. and removal isn t going to help him all that much. he will get a slightly different jury, it would be all of northern georgia rather than having it be just fulton county. right. i m sorry, instead of fulton county. so it means that it would be a different jury. but the law is the same, the prosecutor s the same, still under georgia law, it still will not be a portable defense, because it is a state one. no, those are really good points. representative shannon, i m going to squeeze in a quick break. but afterwards i m going to talk to you and get your thoughts on some important developments as well.
pressure that he was put under. she can even use an fbi agent to testify to what happened in the grand jury. there s a lot of ways she can put in evidence. so if the basic remember, the burden is on mark meadows. he has to present it. that is a movement he has to prove. if she says, your honor, you can dismiss this now because it didn t meet the burden, then she doesn t have to put on any of that defense evidence. but if the judge is in doubt, then she will have to put these witnesses on, and i think that will robot anything any of the claims that are being made in defense of his getting this trial removed. and removal isn t going to help him all that much. he will get a slightly different jury, it would be all of northern georgia rather than having it be just fulton county. right. i m sorry, instead of fulton county. so it means that it would be a different jury. but the law is the same, the prosecutor s the same, still under georgia law, it still
state, who can testify to the pressure that he was put under. she can even use an fbi agent to testify to what happened in the grand jury. there s a lot of ways she can put in evidence. so if the basic remember, the burden is on mark meadows. he has to present it. that is a movement he has to prove. if she says, your honor, you can dismiss this now because it didn t meet the burden, then she doesn t have to put on any of that defense evidence. but if the judge is in doubt, then she will have to put these witnesses on, and i think that will robot anything any of the claims that are being made in defense of his getting this trial removed. and removal isn t going to help him all that much. he will get a slightly different jury, it would be all of northern georgia rather than having it be just fulton county. right. i m sorry, instead of fulton county. so it means that it would be a different jury. but the law is the same, the prosecutor s the same, still under georgia law, it still will
was knowingly putting forward false material? i ll respond as best i can within the confines of privilege. there s an olds old saying for trial lawyers, maybe you re familiar with it, the ultimate move in a trial is to take the government s best evidence and turn it around and say that s the best defense evidence, and i think that s what s going to happen with that particular overt act. i m a little bit constrained by privilege to say here s this e-mail that s going to come out and this discussion that happened, but in summary, what the evidence surrounding that filing is going to show is the exact opposite of what the d.a. thinks. in fact, it shows john eastman, and other attorneys, but scrupulous to ensure that no knowingly false statements were included in legal filings, including the filing in federal court as none were. one of the things we discussed last time was the fact that donald trump los angeles the election. president biden was president-elect at the time of the activi