california. catastrophic flooding there is causing situations like this. obviously you can see folks wading through the muddy mess there and this blue vehicle now stuck, appears the driver is still trying to maneuver the vehicle, and somebody is attempting to get it out. the a.p. bringing us this video. someone with a camera behind it, but just obviously catastrophic flooding, mudslides sweeping through the state and pictures like this in our newsroom. that is cathedral city, california, we are told. john: all the rain causing a lot of problems, they don t usually get rain like that. hunter biden s legal team reportedly tried to drag president biden directly into their defense efforts warning that they would call on the president to appear as a witness to defend his son against criminal charges. shocking legal strategy revealed
just holding up newspapers and articles and not a document related to an iran military attack. for donald trump, he s only complicating his own legal counsel s defense efforts here as they begin to build their case over the next year. let me pick up on that second part that vaughn was just referencing, the other new charge that has to do with the classified military planning document trump allegedly showed an author and publicist and a couple of staffers at bedminster, the one trump claimed didn t actually exist. it turns out prosecutors have the document. how significant is that? he had said it was bravado. he had at one point implied it was ruffling newspaper. turns out they got the document and it was classified. you know how they got it, he returned it to them. the indictment lays out a chat and has a range of dates for how long they kept the documents. they received that document in january 2022. that is the time he returns the documents to the national
death penalty jury. two trials in one. then there is the sentencing phase. the sentence has laid out at least part of the defense. claiming there was dna from others. no connection between the victims and the defendant. what do you make of the defense efforts at this point? bad facts make bad lawyers. is that their best hand that their victims did not know the defendant? the testimony of some of the proceedings have come to light. this is not a fishing expedition when a defense attorney says directly to the judge this is not a fishing expedition, you can be pretty sure it is a fishing expedition. going out the defenses. going at the dna evidence.
death penalty jury. two trials in one. then there is the sentencing phase. the sentence has laid out at least part of the defense. claiming there was dna from others. no connection between the victims and the defendant. what do you make of the defense efforts at this point? bad facts make bad lawyers. is that their best hand that their victims did not know the defendant? the testimony of some of the proceedings have come to light. this is not a fishing expedition when a defense attorney says directly to the judge this is not a fishing expedition, you can be pretty sure it is a fishing expedition. going out the defenses. going at the dna evidence.
two trials in one. the guilt phase and sentencing phase. the defense laid out part of defense claiming there was d.n.a. to others and there is no connection between the victims and the defendant. it is early, what do you make of the defense efforts at that point? bad facts make bad lawyers, is that their best hand, the victims didn t know the defendant? some of the testimony, some of the proceedings that have come to life, the defense said to the judge, this is not a fishing expedition. when the defense says this is not a fishing expedition, you can be sure it is a fishing expedition. they are going at the office and going at d.n.a. evidence and