the end of the month. mccarthy, caught on tape talking about kicking trump out of office ran to mar-a-lago weeks later. chairman bennie thompson writing, you declined voluntary cooperation, and we re left with no choice but to issue thank you subpoena. in a letter sent asking for his cooperation in january, the committee said they wanted to talk to mccarthy about his, quote, conversations with president trump before, during, and after the violent january 6th attacks. mccarthy today slamming the committee s probe. look, my view on the committee has not changed. they re not conducting a legitimate investigation. it seems as though they just want to go after their political opponents. congressman scott perry having a similar thing today. the fact that they sent it to the press before they sent it to the members proves it s all about headlines. bennie thompson saying today he hopes they all comply, and so far there have not been conversations about contempt if they don t.
Thats a closed session but its significant for several reasons. First, you mentioned hes the president s personal lawyer. Hes known him for years, they go back in terms of business dealings. This is a person whos been in a lot of private, personal and confidential conversations with the president so it will be very, very interesting to see what kind of information hes going to be able to reveal. And then of course its a sign of a potential escalation or widening in the russia probe given there have been other significant interviews. Of course, Jared Kushner met with the Senate Intel Committee as well. But this will be a very interesting interview to watch and again as the headlines play out with that on the hill, on tuesday, while the president is in new york, trying to focus on things like the threat from north korea, the current Iran Nuclear Deal and other pressing issues. He will be trying to make this a global debut on The World Stage where others may be talking about some of the d
got the situation whereby some people seem to have been fined £50 whilst they can get into individual decision making decisions on individual cases they could certainly provide some generic framework they applied. i certainly provide some generic framework they applied. i wonder if ou think framework they applied. i wonder if you think this framework they applied. i wonder if you think this is framework they applied. i wonder if you think this is a framework they applied. i wonder if you think this is a fair framework they applied. i wonder if you think this is a fair question i framework they applied. i wonder if you think this is a fair question to i you think this is a fair question to ask whether subconsciously or otherwise the fact it was the prime minister being investigated, did that make her difference in the minds of anybody involved in the investigation? i minds of anybody involved in the investigation? investigation? i am sure subconsciously - investigation? i am su
illegitimate and inflation and all that, you re still going to have to account for what happened on january 6th. that takes me back to the first point, if the commission is not prepared to the subpoena they have put on the street today, they might as well put up shop and go home, because everything after that if you don t enforce it becomes harder to prove to the american people that you re serious about get to the bottom of this. i would also add to your analysis that when you talk about january 6th as something that happened in the past, a threat that was, it misses the piece of this which is most critical and urgent, which is this is an ongoing threat. these are people in powerful decision-making decisions who still get to do their jobs. if you try to message this an a voter who has not been paying as