System . Obviously, she knew that i had the west byfleet case and we would have just dealt with our own cases, really. I dont think that would have been much cross about where you work with your case, so to speak. But, yes, from this e mail, you can see that the Expert Witness bubbly was going to be needed, but you tended to just focus on your own case and you would not really have time or get into too much detail discussing other cases with other investigators. Flan discussing other cases with other investigators discussing other cases with other investigators. Discussing other cases with other investiuators. ,. ,. , investigators. Can we please look at oll investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138. Investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138, please . Investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138, please . Around investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138, please . Around the | poll 00167138, please . Around the similar time a few days later, if we could
that that story, or those stories rather, as told by your dad are accurate, and the stories told by jennifer graves and susan s friends, that susan was horrified by this and wanted to get the heck away from this as much as she could, that those stories are lies? that is right. so, on that night in december 2009, when you went out to the desert with the kids to go camping, what happened to susan? i think that susan simply left. simply left? i mean, midnight, 1:00 in the morning, just i ve had enough, i m out of here? was she angry those days? no. was she distressed? no. did she continue to assert that she loved you? yes.
butjustice secretary alex chalk says all the agencies involved have pledged to co operate to give mr malkinson the answers he deserves. what i want to get to is the fact of who knew what and when, why did they make the decisions, were those judgments correct, and how can people properly be held to account and lessons learned for what happened. so what will it investigate? let s start with this forensic evidence. this is the vest top worn by the victim during the attack in 2003. but in 2007, scientists, using new techniques, found dna on the top from another man. the sample came from near where the woman had been bitten. in december 2009, the scientists discussed the finding with prosecutors and detectives. one of the lawyers wrote that the discovery was surprising and crime specific . the dna appeared to be from the real attacker there was no trace of mr malkinson. earlier in 2009, andy malkinson lobbied the criminal cases review
to account and lessons learned for what happened. so what will it investigate? let s start with this forensic evidence. this is the vest top worn by the victim during the attack in 2003. but in 2007, scientists, using new techniques, found dna on the top from another man. the sample came from near where the woman had been bitten. in december 2009 the scientists discussed the finding with prosecutors and detectives. one of the lawyers wrote that the discovery was surprising and crime specific . the dna appeared to be from the real attacker there was no trace of mr malkinson. now, earlier in 2009, andy malkinson lobbied the criminal cases review commission to send his case back to judges. but in 2010 an investigator concluded: there is nothing to be gained by having any of the dna exhibits re tested yet again. in 2012 the ccrc dismissed mr malkinson s application one of two rejections he received. that dna sample has since been
everyone else, a fateful choice it turned out. and what you are telling me is that story, or those stories rather as told by your dad or accurate and the stories told by jennifer graves and susan s friends that susan was horrified by this and wanted to get the heck away from this as much as she could, those stories are lies? that is right. so, on that night in december 2009, when you went out to the desert with the kids to go camping, what happened to susan? i think that susan simply left. simply left? i mean, midnight, 1:00 in the morning, i ve had enough and i m out of here? was she angry those days? no. was she distressed?