americans and their governmentm. a decade ago. the new york times admitted this. the times markedis the anniversary of 9/11 by publishinhed a piecg a piece on the rise of domestic surveillance abuses which explode after the 9/11 attacks. the patriot act, according to st the new york times, quote, govem quickly became a sort of shorthand for government abusenh and overreaching, which, quote, inflicted collateral damage on political dissent, religiousl liberty and the freedom of association, end quote. that is still true, in fact, truer than it s ever been,trage. and it is still a tragedy. what s fascinating is that stopd the new york times has stoppedi acknowledging it. in fact, remarkablity, there wae not a single mention oft page o the 9/11 anniversaryf yesterday. on the front page of yesterday s paper, the paper that purports to represent new york , the epicenter of the 9/11 attacks. now, why would the new york times ignore 9/11? ignore well, good question, be the new york
Steven bril, journalist and author of america s bitter pill. de dr. dean, we have a set of principles laid down by donald trump which might amount to either what he delivers or basically attack lines for democrats to use on what he doesn t deliver. for example, now telling the washington post, health insurance, health care for everybody. that s, of course, the slang for universal coverage, as they say. that s the standard he s laid down now. if he doesn t deliver that, than he is not delivering on his promise. yeah. you know, for all of the things we say about trump that are unattractive, he does have political instincts and he does know where people are headed.