but this is going to be a strictly edited production. they aren t going to release anything that makes the former president looked back. and they may even send it back for sinister music. they have the ability to end it as they want to. and if they are not careful, they can really come back to hurt them. because it could show the fbi agents just doing their jobs, walking around peacefully with the secret service in plain clothes at a reasonable our where there s no guns blazing. and they could have shots of some of the confidential documents that the foreign president wasn t supposed to take. so it could backfire. and i think that is why they are not sure yet whether they want this released. but in the, and they want this to rally their base, they want to make sure that they keep raising money. and the dark side of this is that it will increase the iron towards the fbi and make some of the threats against the individual agents even more dangerous. a lot of people will believe it. t
drivers. as he would want it. it s also kind of interesting that we got the state and the federal, like they re not necessarily, two different governments, two different apparatuses, it s almost, i wonder if it s a race to an indictment? because things are happening on multiple fronts here. i have to catch myself sometimes with the investigations, because there are so many different ones to equate, i m not just talking about january 6th, this about mar-a-lago, oh no, this is georgia. and you are so bought in, our viewers don t live with this all day long. i think to the folks at home a kind of blends together. it s madness. thank you both, good to see you. now, i wanna bring in david ehrenberg, he s a state attorney for palm beach, florida. dave, i mean, hello to you. you would live in west palm beach right near mar-a-lago. this is all in your wheel house. so, we appreciate you joining us. this is the same florida-based judge who approved the search warrant. we ll hear argument
denying that he had them and then accusing the fbi of planting certain evidence and now it s the classification. i look forward to what is hearing what s next. but it seems likely that this one is going to fail. there was also one point in there and which he had a certain amount. but now we are finding there is more here. oh, wait, i forgot i had a few with me in my home. david ehrenberg, i want to play you something that stephanie ruhle s guest said late last night i would not be surprised, by the way, if they re actually trying to fingerprint some of these documents to determine who touched them and win. because we are dealing with government employees here who probably have fingerprints on. file so who has touched them? who has seen them? that s part of the damage assessment. but also we are so focused on trump that i think the aim instigations, definitely, has to include others who were conspirators with them. he can t have done this all alone and it s unlikely that he pack
because that would give way the sources, not give away the ghost and although there are news organizations out there, they are now suing to try and get that after david, it will not be released by the court. kudos to merit garland because he proved and he was as the depth of this whole political gain than donald trump. that s amazing from a guy who comes from the judiciary who is always strive to be seen as a political. not a lot of us open a policy. let s take a macro view here now with the investigation but other legal troubles that trump is dealing with right now. justice, weak on top of the fbi, search a court will congress could see his taxes. when trump pleaded the fifth hundreds of times in the new york civil case, a judge denied a motion to dismiss this criminal case against the trump organization. oh and that is not to mention that the former cabinet officials have been meeting with the january six committee. and the investigation in fulton county, georgia is still ongoing.
the search warrant to be classified for it to be a crime. earlier in the, week and we see now trump received a federal grand jury subpoena, for sensitive documents for us president. nts for us president. pivotal questions remain. what happens next in the probe? is the doj focus on just trump or potentially others in the circle? and are the defenses that trump has offered so far likely to stand up in a courtroom if things get that far? this morning i brought a panel of experts to help make sense of it all. barbara mcquade is a former u.s. attorney and msnbc legal analyst. david is the state attorney at and joel reuben is a former deputy assistant secretary of state and nuclear weapons policy expert. welcome into all of you and thank you for being here this morning. we actually start with nbc s gary graham back in washington d.c.. more on those documents and the reaction to all of this.