We intend to keep working with Council Members to acknowledge and respond appropriately to this serious incident. We dont so how members can cast doubt on this violation. I dont see that permissiveness. There was a letter sent by the president to senator coons where he says quote robust enforcement of sanctions related to irans nonnuclear activity will continue to be a critical, a critical, element of our policy. I will maintain powerful u. S. Sanctions under a host of Domestic Authority countering irans support for terrorism, human rights abuse, and the elicit sale or transfer of iranian weapons. I ask to place this in the record without objections. Powers and this letter because we know we have sanctions if you counter irans support for terrorism, human rights abuse, missile proliferation, elicit sale or transfer of iranian weapons. Those sanctions havent been changed. They will still continue. So i just, i just dont like this narrative that is coming out of here. I think it sends a
Now they regulate what earphones they can use because the league has established a contract with one of the providers and i want him to wear those. This is an ongoing 24hour endeavor. It wants people to emulate him look up to these athletes and they do. And that they can tell you being involved in youth football this is very sad but its true. In some instances, the only positive male role models that many Young Americans today have happened to be professional athletes they see on sundays or at night on television. I think its important to preface that because this is not just a sport thats played on a field three hours at a time. This has deep impact throughout society and there are millions of Young Americans who look up to these players and whatever happens or does not happen has a deep impact on them. For many of them its the only male role model they have unfortunately in many cases where people go wrong. That is why the rate rise case interested me. The situation with mr. Rice inv
There exactly. Okay as a procedural matter were taking Public Comment and then going to the vote. Okay is there a second to the vice chairs motion. Second. Im bob im glad youre taking this clarifying action and i also want to point out in the various notices to the various workshops that ethnics has had ive not seen indication the public is notified it might be worth putting that in behold face willie brown can do his own right of action people with resources they dont need to go through your folks it would help if the public know guess so that i wasnt clear we could bypass the agencies and go directly to the court thats something we need to know. Thank you. Just a to clarify the reference to prop jackson that was in the procedure that riders notice to the City Attorney and a waiting and the law provide for a private right of action theres no mention of attorneys fees so this is discussing a boarder right of action. As prop j will it up later i want to say the judicial history on prop
Commissioners any comments yes. Mr. Chair this is another one i dont understand why were answering it is way were answering it i would change to we agree a broad citizens right to enforce those lose will make sure the laws are enforced this is an apple pie motherhood type of statement we disagree thats our answer why do we disagree that with a broader citizens statement that the laws will be enforced any kind of broadening of the power to enforce ethnical aforementioned in our socket to the good whether by a right of action to citizens or anyone we should agree. The recommendation that this can be done by the board of supervisors enacting a particular version that gives the folks the right like a private attorney general action to enforce the award of attorneys fees thats an incentive for citizens to help out in ethnical matters and if the jury has found that is good and that the board of supervisors should be asked to do that i think we should join in with them other comments in the c
The particular reasons why j was struck down because of having Something Like that or other things in that but tang taking out the language that were youre going prop j as part of the solution we ought to agree with that i think what the court held is that the sharing of penalties with the filer may not be legal. I know there are chisel blowers that provide those kinds of things but anyway, when you say asking the board of supervisors to enhance a right of of action is there a general right of action at the present time for someone unless they she show personal injury i have no idea but if the board of supervisors were to see fit to take a shot anothers passing Something Like this and it were to go through the courts again maybe it will be upheld. Prop j was struck down by a District Court or a lower court in los angeles about 14 or 15 years but was never really contested beyond that so were not talking about prop j distribution one that was done by the u. S. Superior court may i make