it has been in the shop. you know my wheelchair vehicle has been in the shop for the last two weeks, we don t issue the citation. we take it off the table because we get the repair records and say that the transmission was out and they were not able to use this vehicle. we take all of those things in consideration and it is a 6-month time period because we take into consideration that maybe you will have a slow month somewhere in that six months. we are hoping that at least half of those six months you can get it done. and the second question is on a monthly basis, how many complaints do you have from handicap individuals that are saying that they are not being serviced? you know that is hard to say, because typically the call is simply, i called. and no one responded. it is not so much of a you know like. do you track that information if someone calls. because generally, if i required a ramp vehicle, and i called to make an appointment or called in for service, and the
housing in here. and i mean, they swatted down the community and approved thousands of units in this area all up and down south of market. while the community screameds don t put in the housing, the department kept on saying this isn t housing. it is housing, the department admits that was a huge mistakes that 99 percent of the live work units is nothing but housing, look at how many there are in this particular area. the arrow points to where this one unit is. there is more than 65 buildings having live-work within a very small three-block radius. sorry, victor, i don t know if you can do anything about this, but or monitors are not allowing that. i will just hand it up. it is a map showing where they are. it is grossly unfair to now say this housing deserves no protection. and it does not make any sense. it is grossly unfair and unreasonable to say that the ha bitbility and livebility for this housing can t be done. for this particular project, the position taken by
be corroborated by the zoning administrator s testimony. i will not bother reading the five procedures that everything went through. just an over review. pardon me? are you, confused? the sole reason for the appellant s case is that they are not happy with the out come of the discretionary hearing and the wish to further impede the building process. the appellant s brief provides no new evidence and does not attempt to justify any zoning error or abuse of discretionary power. you should focus your comments on the denovo review. it means that we are hearing it fresh, it applies to the zoning determinations and which there is not. it is a building permit. i understand. so, i guess that i am not quite prepared. i will pull out my file on the, which you probably have a copy of that i attached which was the discretion review hearing. and the point there is that not to lose focus on the key element, which is that this building by all rights could be a 40-foot buil
i will not bother reading the five procedures that everything went through. just an over review. pardon me? are you, confused? the sole reason for the appellant s case is that they are not happy with the out come of the discretionary hearing and the wish to further impede the building process. the appellant s brief provides no new evidence and does not attempt to justify any zoning error or abuse of discretionary power. you should focus your comments on the denovo review. it means that we are hearing it fresh, it applies to the zoning determinations and which there is not. it is a building permit. i understand. so, i guess that i am not quite prepared. i will pull out my file on the, which you probably have a copy of that i attached which was the discretion review hearing. and the point there is that not to lose focus on the key element, which is that this building by all rights could be a 40-foot building. so a 40-foot building, let s say four-stories of te
on that motion, president hwang. i. commissioner? aye. commissioner honda? aye. the vote is 4-0. the suspension is reduced to 45 days on that basis. thank you. okay. thank you. number 7, appeal no 12-145, abolfath hosseinioum, 965 mission street, appealing the imposition of the penalty on november 6, 2012, for construction work done without a permit. application number, 2012/11/05/3563. the matter is on for today. you can begin with seven minutes to present your case. good evening, president. and good evening commissioners and good evening. could you speak into the mic? yes. good evening, everybody. and so my name is abolfath, hosseinioum and i am the owner of 965 and i am here for the notice that was issued for demolition work that the permit was in process, but not issued. and this work, the scope of the work is moving some interior non-bearing walls and some suspended ceiling for the future ti work. i have applied many months before starting the j