throw in right now, sanatorium, maybe he would buy in it or out of it. maybe he would be on that cut line for this crucial debate. is his criticism having any impact? is fox maybe getting cold feet about this criteria at all? it s fascinating to watch because the party wanted more control this time around. they wanted to make sure the debate weren t as sprawling of a process. but it may be just that. it could be a mess. sanatorium and other conservative contenders, if they re not going to find a way on to that official stage, look for a lot of these groups to try and invite the candidates to speak elsewhere. there s going to be pressure for top tier contenders to not participate. is it fair for someone who is right on the cuff to be left out? it s an interesting dilemma. i feel some sympathy for the organizers, whether it s fox or anybody else trying to put one of these things on. because the logistics of having 15 or 16 candidates on the debate stage and trying to have anything in
throw in right now, sanatorium, maybe he would bybe in it or out of it. maybe he would be on that cut line for this crucial debate. is his criticism having any impact? is fox maybe getting cold feet about this criteria at all? it s fascinating to watch because the party wanted more control this time around. they wanted to make sure the debate weren t as sprawling of a process. but it may be just that. it could be a mess. sanatorium and other conservative contenders, if they re not going to find a way on to that official stage, look for a lot of these groups to try and invite the candidates to speak elsewhere. there s going to be pressure for top tier contenders to not participate. is it fair for someone who is right on the cuff to be left out? it s an interesting clem ma. i feel some sympathy for the organizers, whether it s fox or anybody else trying to put one of these things on. because the logistics of having 15 or 16 candidates on the debate stage and trying to have anything i
bashing hillary clinton and leaving out the one female candidate in the race. if you have 10 to 15 candidates up there, she s running probably about 13th place, if you want to extend the criteria in some way that includes her, it s lard to leave out someone like george pataki, there are obvious problems with this, first of all, the question is, the average of five most recent polls. which are they going to allow? they didn t say. ppp, a pretty credible firm, but a democratic firm, i m assuming they re not going to include that. a lot of these polling averages we look at do include now. the bigger problem is this, there s no consensus among pollsters, about who to include in these polls. the average poll, one will include george pataki, one won t. one will include rick perry, one won t. rand paul is in all of them, you get down near that cut line, around the 10 spot, you do not
bashing hillary clinton and leaving out the one female candidate in the race. if you have 10 to 15 candidates up there, she s running probably about 13th place, if you want to extend the criteria in some way that includes her, it s lard to leave out someone like george pataki, there are obvious problems with this, first of all, the question is, the average of five most recent polls. which are they going to allow? they didn t say. ppp, a pretty credible firm, but a democratic firm, i m assuming they re not going to include that. a lot of these polling averages we look at do include now. the bigger problem is this, there s no consensus among pollsters, about who to include in these polls. the average poll, one will include george pataki, one won t. one will include rick perry, one won t. rand paul is in all of them, you get down near that cut line, around the 10 spot, you do not
bashing hillary clinton and leaving out the one female candidate in the race. if you have 10 to 15 candidates up there, she s running probably about 13th place, if you want to extend the criteria in some way that includes her, it s lard to leave out someone like george pataki, there are obvious problems with this, first of all, the question is the average of five most recent polls. which are they going to allow? they didn t say. ppp, a pretty credible firm but a democratic firm, i m assuming they re not going to include that. a lot of these polling averages we look at do include now. the bigger problem is this there s no consensus among pollsters, about who to include in these polls. the average poll one will include george pataki, one won t. one will include rick perry one won t. rand paul is in all of them you get down near that cut line around the 10 spot you do not