congregations just because they were not willing to take on this brawler mentality. you use the words earlier, pugilistic, that is in many ways how the evangelical mind has been conditioned to expect something more than just biblical doctrine. it is now, we need you to fight against our enemies who are out to get us. tim, it s an extraordinary book. the book is the kingdom, the power, and the glory. thank you for writing it. congratulations. that s our show for tonight. now it is time for the last word with lawrence o donnell. good evening, lawrence. good evening, alex. we all remember where we were the night that the draft opinion of the supreme court s overturning of roe v. wade came out. samuel alito s draft opinion on it. i ll never forget running down the hallways here with it in my hands, not believing that we had such a document. tonight, in this hour, i have something almost as good. and it involves what will be the opinion of the supreme court in donald trump s a
ago democrats were preparing to impeach donald trump from withholding aid to ukraine in an attempt to get political dirt on joe biden. republicans were not surprisingly outraged. but there was one republican congressman in a particular with a very specific reason for opposing trump s impeachment, a reason that he repeated over and over and over. the founding fathers, the fathers of this country warned against single party impeachment. they said it would be piddly divisive, perhaps irreparably divisive for the country. the founders of this country understand single party impeachment, or because they feared it would bitterly and perhaps irreparably divide our nation. the founders of this country want against a single party impeachment, you know why, you guys know why. because the fear it would bitterly and perhaps irreparably divide our nation. the founding fathers warned us, the spirit single party impeachment, they knew it would bitterly divide the country, it might b
left, like, what do you put on that generation of children that are witnessing this level of draw trauma and, destruction, and death? and peter beinart, thank you both, appreciate it. that is all in on this tuesday night. alex wagner tonight starts right now. good evening, alex. thank, you my friend, we have a lot to get to this evening. thank you tom for joining with me tonight. this time of year, four years ago, democrats were preparing to impeach donald trump for withholding aid to ukraine in an attempt to get political dirt on joe biden. the republicans were not surprisingly outraged. but there was one republican congressman in particular who had a very specific reason for opposing trump s impeachment, a reason that he repeated over and over and over. but the founding fathers, the founders of this country, warned against single party impeachment. they said it would be bitterly divisive, protect perhaps irreparably divisive for the country. the founders of this cou
congregations just because they were not willing to take on this brawl or mentality. you use the words earlier, a pugilistic, that is in many ways how the evangelical mind has been conditioned to expect something more than just biblical doctrine. it is now we need you to fight against our enemies who are out to get us. tim, it s an extraordinary book. the book is the kingdom, in the power, and the glory. thank you for writing it. congratulations. that s our show for tonight. now it is time for the last word with lawrence o donnell. good evening, lawrence. as word w good evening, alex. we all remember where we were the night that the draft opinion of the supreme courts overturning roe v. wade came out. samuel leto s draft opinion on. never forget running down the hallways here with it in my hands, not believing that we had such a document. tonight, in this hour, i have something almost as good. and it involves what will be the opinion of the supreme court and donald trum
ingraham angle from washington. thank you for being with us. putting evil in context, that s the focus of tonight s angle. more fallout from the hill testimony from college presidents who have equivocating on the antisemitism atmosphere on their campuses. some of the most revealing and disturbing exchanges are just now being seen by americans. specifically calling for genocide of jews, does that constitute bullying and harassment? if directed, it is harassment. so yes? it is condepend not decision. calling for genocide of jews is depending on the context? if the speech becomes conduct, it can be harassment, yes. laura: surely the esteemed harvard university president had a much clearer response. at harvard does calling for genocide much jews violate bullying or harassment, yes or no? it can be depending on the context? what is the context? targeted as an individual, crossing into conduct that is bullying, harassment, intimidation, that is actionable condu