Group lifespring, but someone who really jumped head first into fighting cults afterwards. she was someone who, you know, was a part of organizing multiple training sessions for congressional staffers, did some emcees for a dinner that cult awareness network put on in washington, d.c., in 1989. it s interesting listening to her at the time because she is saying things, you know, like i know that what led me into this cult, it s having that is still here with me today and i am trying to figure out what it is about me that made me susceptible to falling into such a group. for people who knew her, it was interesting to contrast their experiences to her then to see her us spouse some of these conspiracy theory conspiracy theories about the election now. what stood out most? i mean, in in speaking to person who helped ginny in organizing a training session for congressional staffers in 1988, they said something striking, which was, you know,
Scientology v. the Internet - Everything2.com everything2.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from everything2.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Scientology doesn’t take criticism lightly. Since L. Ron Hubbard first established his religion, it’s had its share of dissenters, and it’s struck back
Recent calls to deprogram QAnon conspiracy followers are steeped in discredited notions about brainwashing. As popularly imagined, brainwashing is a coercive procedure that programs new long-term personality changes. Deprogramming, also coercive, is thought to undo brainwashing.
As a professor of religious studies who has written and taught about alternative religious movements, I believe such deprogramming conversations do little to help us understand why people adopt QAnon beliefs. A deprogramming discourse fails to understand religious recruitment and conversion and excuses those spreading QAnon beliefs from accountability.
A brief brainwashing history
Deprogramming, a method thought to reverse extreme psychological manipulation, can’t be understood apart from the concept of brainwashing.
Source: The Conversation â USA â By Paul Thomas, Chair and Professor of Religious Studies, Radford University
Recent calls to deprogram QAnon conspiracy followers are steeped in discredited notions about brainwashing. As popularly imagined, brainwashing is a coercive procedure that programs new long-term personality changes. Deprogramming, also coercive, is thought to undo brainwashing.
As a professor of religious studies who has written and taught about alternative religious movements, I believe such deprogramming conversations do little to help us understand why people adopt QAnon beliefs. A deprogramming discourse fails to understand religious recruitment and conversion and excuses those spreading QAnon beliefs from accountability.