united states is not a traitor to the united states. the president of the united states is not a spy for vladimir putin. the president of the united states has been wrongly accused for two and a half years, had his administration just so bothered, so harassed by these political operatives sean: let me ask you this. and yet he has managed to be successful. sean: let s imagine jim jordan, mark meadows, matt gaetz, doug collins and others have a chance to question mueller.r they want to know when he knew there was no collusion. you had a broad mandate, when did you have time for fara violations a that are never invoked, and taxi medallions, and loan applications, and tax violations by the way, always pay your taxes, don t lie on loan applications, we ve got ity but with the broad mandate, he didn t look at all into the russian dossier, what
won t come on. i hear that, and i also see that hillary s russian dossier and robert mueller didn t bring up any of that. why? i think you answer the question.. he had no intention of bringing that up because he and the people on his team were going after president trump, and they had nothing there. i think another major questionon that mueller is going to have to answer i think it is a huge mistake for him to come in and testify, by the way. he is going to have to answer, the second you knew that information about how the fisa warrant was obtained by false information and he knew it why did you not go back to that court? you have an obligation, as the chief prosecutor on this case, an ethical and moral obligation to take it back to the fisa court, and he did not do that, as far as we know. sean: how does he justify that, but he violations?o that s a broad mandate.
mueller.th sean: i would like to knowld why he sent strzok and page s phones back to the manufacturer to get cleaned. by the way, did he fire them or was it mccabe? because mccabe says it wasn t mueller. he needs to tread very carefully in this hearing, or he is going to be the subject of an investigation. sean: let me tell you something, i don t think bill barr can bail him out anymore than he already did, that was my read on it. was that your read? sean, i ve got a pretty simple question for robert mueller: when did you know there was no collusion, and why did the investigation goio past that point? i think a lot of people want to know the answer. i would also call into question his political motivation. what motivated him to go out and give that press conference if it wasn t just to give more fuel to democrats for impeachment? his report had already been out in the public domain almost in full.n the attorney general and then deputy attorney general rod rosenstein already cam
possibly going to break tomorrow. one, they let you get without revealing sources, not ready, but it is very clear is coming. it goes back if i remember correctly, to this show, and you and sara carter in march of 2017. that s exactly right. if you remember, that is when we began reporting on the marked increase in the 2016 election in unmaskings by the obama administration, and eventually we learned that samantha power, the u.n. ambassador, was the unmasker-in-chief, making hundreds of requests to take the names of americans that are supposed to be redacted in intelligence reports, and unmasking the names. tonight, i have these documents, that i m going through, sean, these are the official emails samantha power, and what i can report is that samantha power has the same sort of anti-trump bias in her government emails that we saw with pete strzok and lisa page at the fbi.
hillary s victory party, didn t turn out that way. only democrats you know about that, sean sean: andrew weissmann s atrocious history even with all of the staff he had listen, hang on a second. the 2800 subpoenas, 500 witnesses, all of this, the basis on the investigation was what? collusion, conspiracy. and what did bob mueller conclude? there was none. even with those people. and i want to know the same thing when did you know this was not the case? it had to be early on, because even peter strzok said early on, there is no there there. that was peter strzok s words. of course, they can t show that in his text messages anymore because they let the phone get wiped out when he left. sean: jay sekulow reissued one of the phones to somebody else, because the federal government can t afford an iphone. sean: this is not going to work out the way they think, trust me. jay sekulow, counsel to the president, also big news yesterday. there is other news coming up