2016. On the left, congressman Chris Collins who was indicted on Felony Charges less than two weeks ago. He was the first to endorse donald trump for president. And then on the right side, thats congressman Duncan Hunter. He was the second sitting member of Do Know Support donald trump for president and now today he too has been indicted on multiple Felony Charges. Who was third . As i say, congressman Duncan Hunter probably considers himself lucky today. If youre going to get indicted, today was probably a pretty good day. Because the news of his indictment arrived on a day like no other. In this remarkable scandal ridden candidacy. We actually called Michael Beschloss to ask if theres anything like this. Has there ever been a single day in the news for any u. S. President that held similar
come one in u. S. History would be march 1st, 1974. That produced this headline the next day. March 1st, 1974, was the day a grand jury indicted Richard Nixons campaign manage here he had named Att
Eric Holder, Barack Obama wingman, moans Donald Trump will end 'democracy'
washingtontimes.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from washingtontimes.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
these are people who put their state, who put constitutional election law over loyalty to the party. they are not anti-trumpers. rusty, to the associated press, said he would vote for donald trump in 2024 over joe biden. this is not an anti-trump republican. this is somebody who backs donald trump but who nonetheless resisted pressure to try to overturn legit election results. the big difference today is firsthand evidence from the former president himself. the first time that we will have not just what people said that they said to donald trump but this is the first time we are going to hear the voice, the words of donald trump sounds some have compared this to sort of criminal conspirator, a mob figure, saying, i just need
is there more evidence to build that case? this is sometimes a complicated inquiry for people who aren t trial lawyers. we get hung up on this notion of direct evidence. actually, trial lawyers can use direct evidence or they are use circumstantial evidence. maybe this example will explain how that will play into today s hearing. if you and i watch it snow, then we can say it snowed. that s direct testimony. if we go to sleep at night and there s no snow on the ground the and we wake up in the morning and there s snow, there s a pretty good chance it snowed overnight. that s circumstantial. a lot of the evidence that we are looking at so far about the former president s involvement is circumstantial. nobody is saying, i heard him say he knew he lost the election and wanted the people in georgia to make up the number of votes that he needed. but his own words on tape, it s awfully close. it s very good circumstantial evidence that he knew what the numbers looked like, his campaign fol