Welcome, everybody. I think we have some leadership, about the theyll be coming in. Can you see, can you hear me . Is it working . Well, the election is over. Theyre still counting the votes and making legal challenges, and once all the legal challenges are made and the votes are counted, well have that done. Weve still got two outstanding races in georgia to determine the control of the senate and the committee will keep moving forward doing its work. We have next week social media oversight. I cant wait to have the social media ceos come to the committee and explain themselves about their platform, thats the 17th. I think theres a lot of bipartisan support to take a hard look at social media platform. The act is still business pending before the committee and after the hearing well have markup. But today we have mr. Mccabe, the number two at the fbi during the hurricane. I think hes going to appear remotely, so i appreciate him coming. And what ill do is make a brief Opening Statemen
Enjoy book tv this weekend every weekend on cspan two. Committee judiciary continued its review of the fbis russia probe by hearing testimony from former deputy fbi director Andrew Mccabe. He was asked about the origins of the investigation. Werether actions that taken by the fbi. This after james comey was fired by President Trump. Buckle, everybody. We have some republicans welcome, everybody. We have some republicans at leader elections. The election is over, they are counting the votes and making legal challenges. , we willthose are made have that done. We still have two outstanding races in georgia to determine control of the senate. And the committee will keep moving forward doing its work. Next week, we have social media oversight. To have the social media ceos come to the committee and explain themselves. We will take a hard look at social media platforms. After the hearing, we will have more. Today, we have mr. Mccabe. Number two at the fbi. I think he will appear remotely. I
Cspan. Org or listen on the go with the free cspan radio app. Announcer in june the Supreme Court ruled lgbtq individuals are protected from federal law from employment his termination. Justice Stephen Breyer talks about the decision, how the coronavirus has impacted the courts work, and broadcasting live audio of oral arguments. Moderator welcome, Justice Breyer. Welcome one and all. We are excited to be hosting Supreme Court justice Stephen Breyer. Talia, if you can hear me, turn on your audio and video. I think your audio is on. Weve asked you to start your video and hopefully you can do that. It is a pleasure to welcome everybody back to Harvard Hillel. We have Supreme Court justice Stephen Breyer. Justice breyer is on the United States Supreme Court and one of ascendedpeople to have in our nation. Jews have done18 so before. For our purposes, he was a professor at Harvard Law School and at the Harvard Kennedy school of government. Chief judge of the unites states court of appeals
Breyer. Welcome to one and all. We are excited to be hosting Supreme Court Justice Stephen breyer. The interview will be conducted by talia, my dear friend. Talia is in jerusalem. Talia, if you can hear me, turn on your audio and video. I think your audio is on. Weve asked you to start your video and hopefully you can do that. It is a pleasure to welcome everybody back to Harvard Hillel. We have Supreme Court Justice Stephen breyer. Justice breyer is on the United States Supreme Court and one of only 113 people to have ascended in our nation. I believe only 18 jews have done so before. For our purposes, he was a professor at Harvard Law School and at the Harvard Kennedy school of government. He served as chief judge of the United States court of appeals for the first circuit. Justice breyer, it has been a delight to speak with you over the past few weeks. You have been very kind, generous, so i thank you. When i was a kid i was asked to memorize, as an assignment, the nine justices and
The testimony will be relevant and i will put in the scale in favor of impeachment. We can say they should have gotten a redaction by redaction. Take the unredacted report and go through and make those determinations. You dont think that runs into the walter nixon problem . Again, understand the court saying it is not interested in this argument, but i think if this goes to a high higher there isat will be no reason why we should be putting courts in a position at all, but going to undertake this endeavor, but perhaps with guidelines we will argue about a getrict court, you dont everything, you have to show a and not geted need them grand jury information. How long would that take . Know. Ont i think that would be up to the District Court. I guess im not clear to what the District Court does. The Community Says your honor, it is relevant. The whole notion that the District Court cannot control the senate trial or control documents ordered to be released, this is a question of goesar th